| 26 Apr 2024 |
|  pxc changed their display name from pxc (why) to pxc. | 23:32:17 |
|  Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to Qyriad (she/they). | 23:47:44 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad (she/they) to Qyriad. | 23:47:57 |
| 27 Apr 2024 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to Qyriad . | 00:01:06 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to Qyriad. | 00:09:42 |
| pxc set a profile picture. | 00:46:05 |
| pxc removed their profile picture. | 00:48:05 |
|  @lychee:lefishe.club left the room. | 14:36:57 |
|  @withoutwithin:matrix.org left the room. | 16:03:44 |
|  nadir joined the room. | 18:21:31 |
| 28 Apr 2024 |
|  @axolotl:the-apothecary.club left the room. | 06:00:26 |
|  Remco Schrijver set a profile picture. | 09:10:11 |
|  dave joined the room. | 13:01:09 |
|  dantunes joined the room. | 22:18:46 |
|  @federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 22:47:30 |
| @federicodschonborn:matrix.org left the room. | 23:10:09 |
| 29 Apr 2024 |
|  @winston:milli.ng changed their profile picture. | 00:19:00 |
 woobilicious | Is there any policy around packaging non-system specific derivations? what should I use for the "system" parameter? | 07:25:14 |
| woobilicious | Like if I'm shipping media or config files. | 07:29:12 |
 tomberek | I would usually mark it with the system that produced those files. | 07:32:53 |
| woobilicious | I guess the other thing is to use the target sandbox as a "system" for portable code. | 08:08:25 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 15:29:58 |
 dramforever | can you just ship the same thing with all the systems | 15:39:42 |
 mewp | https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/language/derivations.html says that derivations have a system attribute. changing it will change the hash, and not changing it would prevent one from building locally | 16:06:33 |
| mewp | * https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/language/derivations.html says that derivations have a system attribute. changing it will change the hash, and not changing it would prevent one from building locally | 16:07:05 |
| mewp | so I don't think you can ship the same derivation on all systems | 16:07:28 |
| tomberek | You can ship a derivation of any system to other places. You may lose some niceties like tab completion on the CLI, but nothing prevents it from being done. | 16:09:34 |
| mewp | as I understand it, if you do, you won't be able to build it on such a system locally. am I wrong? | 16:10:33 |
| mewp | (because nix will see that the builder is supposed to execute on a different system than the current one) | 16:11:17 |
| tomberek | Correct, for building. So for these kinds of things I tend to just make one for each system. | 16:13:45 |
