Nix Flakes | 890 Members | |
| 179 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jan 2025 | ||
| I think #rust:nixos.org is more closely related to any issues you might encounter | 01:24:56 | |
| Yes but the thing is it is already prebuild. so its a binary | 01:25:20 | |
| so it has nothing really to do with rust anymore | 01:25:26 | |
| Just packaging a prebuilt binary inside a flake you know | 01:25:45 | |
| https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Packaging/Binaries | 01:25:59 | |
| thank you a lot | 01:26:15 | |
| im not sure why my google not find this thanks | 01:26:20 | |
| 01:29:31 | |
| I have to rewrite this so it point to my (local) prebuilt binary | 01:30:07 | |
| instead of completlely rebuilding it from a github repo | 01:30:25 | |
| not sure if this was flake related sorry | 01:30:51 | |
In reply to @phaitonican:matrix.org Please don't feel bad for asking any questions, I'm just trying to understand why every single message in here is unrelated to the channel. I'm wondering: What public communication indicates to you that this is related to flakes? This is not related to pinning any flake input in any flake lockfile. This is not related about the output forms tod the flake. This is not related to any of the new commands introduced to work with flakes. I am not sure what else I'm missing, except for the fact that the flake interface is the only sane mechanism to use nix (the packaging/building language) unless you want to write your own locking script, use someone elses, or edit hashes by hand every time someone makes a new commit somewhere. (or use channels God forbid) | 01:31:55 | |
| haha :D yea you are right its nix language related | 01:32:29 | |
| i am very new to this sorry | 01:32:39 | |
| If many people's first touching point of using nix properly is via flakes, then maybe we should hurry up and stabilize it 👀 | 01:33:00 | |
| *not every single message just a significant fraction | 01:34:29 | |
| no comment :b | 01:35:55 | |
| Wait no way, we don't have any channels related to packaging? Is nix flakes really topically closest | 01:36:19 | |
| 07:52:32 | ||
| 08:01:44 | ||
| 08:02:15 | ||
| 12:37:06 | ||
| 14 Jan 2025 | ||
| 11:43:54 | ||
| 15 Jan 2025 | ||
| 17:26:04 | ||
| 16 Jan 2025 | ||
| 03:12:03 | ||
| 03:18:14 | ||
| 06:51:32 | ||
| hey, I am using direnv with flakes to install dev dependencies. My issue is that some packages are not available for aarch64-darwin (helm for example), I know nix-darwin can install packages using homebrew. Is there a way to install homebrew package via flake and direnv? | 06:53:44 | |
In reply to @gotha:matrix.orgBrew formulas have dependencies that have to be installed alongside them. Brew also defines builds for those which would be very hard to replicate. It's probably easier to go add aarch64-darwin support for the package you wanna use | 07:11:26 | |
| thank you, I thought so, but I wanted to check if this is something that is done in general | 07:17:38 | |