| 12 Sep 2022 |
 k0kada (he/him) | It is just that it isn't official | 19:04:34 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
you're making your doom emacs with nde I am not making my doom-emacs NDE | 19:04:58 |
| k0kada (he/him) | We are making the default doom-emacs config NDE | 19:05:12 |
| k0kada (he/him) | My config is way more complex than the one in repo | 19:05:27 |
 ckie (they/them) | but that implies it includes everything | 19:05:33 |
| ckie (they/them) | we don't ship all the binaries for spellchecking and stuff | 19:05:47 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
but that implies it includes everything This is why we call it example and not full | 19:05:57 |
| ckie (they/them) | but there's no "nde's emacs" | 19:06:23 |
| ckie (they/them) | if it doesn't have the batteries included | 19:06:29 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Also, most users use the HM module that still has no default config | 19:06:32 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
but there's no "nde's emacs" Ok, what about this? | 19:08:01 |
| k0kada (he/him) | I can remove the default | 19:08:08 |
| k0kada (he/him) | This way the user had to type explicitly that they want the example output | 19:08:38 |
| ckie (they/them) | i think maybe all that is needed is a mindset change from me | 19:09:23 |
| ckie (they/them) | we ship a emacs binary and a big pile of elisp and bytecode | 19:09:44 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
i think maybe all that is needed is a mindset change from me Maybe
I think for most users of Flake, what I did is pretty standard | 19:09:53 |
| ckie (they/them) | what the elisp does is not up to us | 19:09:57 |
| k0kada (he/him) | * Maybe
I think for most users of Flake, what I did is pretty standard | 19:10:03 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Also, for binaries
Eventually I want to add support for non leaky PATHs (I think there is an issue somewhere already)
And the example config could ship with things like `ripgrep` | 19:11:33 |
| k0kada (he/him) | But there is no support for it in NDE right now | 19:11:48 |
| ckie (they/them) | aha okay I figured out why it felt wrong, writing on GH | 19:14:23 |
| ckie (they/them) | or maybe I didn't | 19:15:08 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
aha okay I figured out why it felt wrong, writing on GH Well, replied with my opinion in that matter, but maybe we will end just disagreeing here | 19:31:28 |
| ckie (they/them) | k0kada: don't merge yet, writing bit more | 19:33:33 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Sure | 19:33:57 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
k0kada: don't merge yet, writing bit more Wait, is that issue the "bit more"? | 19:48:09 |
| k0kada (he/him) | BTW, will leave this merge to tomorrow | 19:48:16 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Just in case | 19:48:24 |
| ckie (they/them) | not all of it | 19:48:29 |
| ckie (they/them) | it turns out the bit is big | 19:48:34 |
