| 8 Sep 2023 |
 JoelMcCracken | ive been wondering if thats why it has stalled | 03:12:14 |
| JoelMcCracken | * ive been wondering if thats why it has stalled; the big refactor is ending up in a big mess | 03:12:40 |
| JoelMcCracken | but, FYI, I think doom development is now un-stalling | 04:01:49 |
|  hrnz left the room. | 20:41:32 |
| 9 Sep 2023 |
 woobilicious | Is that doom upstream, or the nix package? | 02:26:45 |
 ckie (they/them) | woobilicious: JoelMcCracken's last messages were about doom itself | 03:11:27 |
| woobilicious | Ahh okay :-) | 03:12:13 |
| woobilicious | I wouldn't mind moving to a "simple-emacs" thing using nix that lets me quickly setup a decent setup of emacs without having to learn lisp. | 04:05:00 |
| ckie (they/them) | i've changed my mind a bit on that since then | 04:06:42 |
| ckie (they/them) | i think doom having its own module system is good, but it should be way more modularized. almost like nixpkgs' evalModules is reusable. it shouldnt be a part of The Big Doom Blob | 04:07:19 |
| ckie (they/them) | but evaling files conditionally gets like, the vast vast majority of the way there. and we can get rid of doom sync with the stuff we talked about before | 04:08:48 |
