| 22 Oct 2022 |
 mei 🌒& | if they're gonna bloat their scope more than the balance changes | 15:40:47 |
| mei 🌒& | * if they're gonna bloat their scope more then the balance changes | 15:40:53 |
 k0kada (he/him) | Well, yeah | 15:43:09 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Maybe if we could ask upstream to be more careful | 15:43:19 |
| k0kada (he/him) | What is actually mutable, what it is not | 15:43:34 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Maybe having a separate file too defining those things so we don't need to fix our patches on every change | 15:43:53 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Also, the profile changes make zero sense for us, I would like to disable it if possible | 15:44:58 |
| mei 🌒& | searching for existing issues | 15:47:46 |
| * mei 🌒& is now reading upstream#1708 | 15:52:21 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
like our impl of straight.el and whatnot is quite inaccurate but yeah If we really think about it, doom-emacs doesn't make too much sense when you have Nix
You can literally have all the advantages of straight.el without dealing with the complexity of it | 16:00:51 |
| k0kada (he/him) | However, rewriting doom-emacs in Nix also doesn't seem like a good idea imo | 16:01:15 |
| mei 🌒& | mm yes, we have a balance to deal with | 16:02:09 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
thoughts on soft fork of the doom repo? Maybe a hard fork could work, where we drop everything related to straight.el and rebuild using the Emacs withPackages | 16:02:16 |
| k0kada (he/him) | But them it is our own lol | 16:02:36 |
