| 22 Oct 2022 |
 k0kada (he/him) | The good point is that at least the straight is building correctly it seems | 15:32:48 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Because the packages loads correctly | 15:32:55 |
 mei 🌒& | mm that's nice | 15:33:02 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Even doom-dashboard is working again | 15:33:06 |
| mei 🌒& | have had a tough day today | 15:33:08 |
| mei 🌒& | ooh! | 15:33:09 |
| k0kada (he/him) | We just have to figure out how to separate the doom-data-dir between what is writeable and what it is not | 15:33:38 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Because the non-writeable part should be loaded from the straight env | 15:33:51 |
| k0kada (he/him) | (BTW, from what I understand doom-data-dir shouldn't be writeable at all, but upstream doesn't seem to care or is in the process of migration 🤷) | 15:34:27 |
| mei 🌒& | yeah upstream seems quite wonky | 15:34:55 |
| mei 🌒& | i'm definitely on the pessimistic side of this but it feels like we're trying to make a very impure thing pure | 15:35:58 |
| mei 🌒& | thoughts on soft fork of the doom repo? | 15:36:26 |
| k0kada (he/him) | I fear us forking doom repo will mean that we eventually get a really broken system in the future | 15:36:57 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Because the Emacs ecosystem moves fast | 15:37:05 |
