| 1 Sep 2022 |
 mei 🌒& | probably okay but ideally in infrequent waves | 22:27:07 |
 k0kada (he/him) | https://github.com/nix-community/nix-doom-emacs/blob/master/flake.nix#L99-L101 | 22:27:16 |
| mei 🌒& | maybe pkgs.lib.warn and alias | 22:27:21 |
| k0kada (he/him) | This should be a derivation, not a function | 22:27:25 |
| k0kada (he/him) | And package was renamed to packages a few nix versions ago | 22:27:39 |
| mei 🌒& | yeah, i think lib.warn for a while | 22:28:00 |
| k0kada (he/him) | In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
maybe pkgs.lib.warn and alias Can't do, IFD again :P | 22:28:03 |
| mei 🌒& | trace then | 22:28:10 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Ok, fair enough | 22:28:16 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Will do in another PR them | 22:28:26 |
| mei 🌒& | but how is that IFD anyway? | 22:28:33 |
| k0kada (he/him) | This is more that I want for this that should be a PR | 22:28:37 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Ah ok, maybe it is not if we use nixpkgs.lib | 22:28:53 |
| mei 🌒& | ooh yeah! | 22:29:27 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Actually, maybe it will not be even using from pkgs.lib (yeah, I am definitively tired) | 22:29:39 |
| k0kada (he/him) | But nixpkgs.lib looks more clean anyway | 22:29:47 |
| mei 🌒& | also tired now and i don't know either | 22:29:55 |
| mei 🌒& | sounds reasonable though | 22:30:00 |
| k0kada (he/him) | BTW, do you use the devShell? | 22:30:47 |
| k0kada (he/him) | I am thiking of just removing it | 22:30:53 |
| k0kada (he/him) | It just creates a Python environment with PyGitHub | 22:31:14 |
| k0kada (he/him) | I think maybe vlaci used it for something? | 22:31:31 |
| mei 🌒& | it gets used by the CI still | 22:32:03 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Ohhh I see | 22:32:19 |
| k0kada (he/him) | nvm them | 22:32:23 |
| mei 🌒& | feels a bit hacky | 22:32:27 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Yeah | 22:32:33 |
| mei 🌒& | but it's convenient! and i didn't write it! | 22:32:37 |
| k0kada (he/him) | Maybe the CI could just have its own shell.nix | 22:32:42 |
| mei 🌒& | then it won't follow the flake.lock | 22:32:57 |
