| 25 Jan 2023 |
 ribosomerocker | i can minimise the dependencies | 18:42:57 |
 mei 🌒& | it's the total | 18:43:11 |
| mei 🌒& | but yeah bare min would help | 18:43:28 |
| ribosomerocker | should be smaller now | 18:54:43 |
| ribosomerocker | i just commited a few commits, the earlier version didn't have my problem, this one should | 19:13:21 |
| mei 🌒& | 5352.3MiB now, will let it go after my nixos fleet rebuilds finish (a long time..) | 19:23:08 |
| 27 Jan 2023 |
| ribosomerocker | so i suppose it didn't build | 15:35:13 |
| ribosomerocker | i think i'll test it on myself on non-nix doom | 15:35:31 |
| ribosomerocker | though i have no idea how to do that | 15:35:35 |
| ribosomerocker | speaking of... you know, NDE seems to have a lot of issues, i'm thinking of just jumping ship to declaratively cloning and running the doom commands and whatnot since it'll be way less buggy... unless NDE does something i don't know about that i might need? the difference is mostly just that nix fetches most of the packages in NDE, right? | 15:37:00 |
| mei 🌒& | ribosomerocker: aha nope my fleet just hasn't finished rebuilding yet :P (had to pause it for sleeping etc) | 17:09:26 |
| mei 🌒& | In reply to @mon:tchncs.de
speaking of... you know, NDE seems to have a lot of issues, i'm thinking of just jumping ship to declaratively cloning and running the doom commands and whatnot since it'll be way less buggy... unless NDE does something i don't know about that i might need? the difference is mostly just that nix fetches most of the packages in NDE, right? there's no network access in the build sandbox -- you'd have to run the doom commands outside a nix build, which is doable and will probably be fine until doom randomly feels like breaking, which it sometimes did for me (a long time ago; maybe they've improved, dunno) | 17:10:29 |
| mei 🌒& | letting your build run now since I have spare resources for now | 17:11:03 |
| mei 🌒& | 
Download image.png | 17:14:34 |
| mei 🌒& | it seems doom is missing the lsp-haskell package, (require 'lsp-haskell) is not found on my emacs | 17:17:16 |
| mei 🌒& | perhaps (package! lsp-haskell) that | 17:17:30 |
| ribosomerocker | In reply to@ckie:ckie.dev
perhaps (package! lsp-haskell) that i don't use lsp-mode, i use eglot | 22:37:33 |
| mei 🌒& | 
Download image.png | 22:40:34 |
| mei 🌒& | thought to SPC c x it | 22:40:50 |
| mei 🌒& | * thought to SPC c X it | 22:40:57 |
| mei 🌒& | * thought to SPC c X/x it | 22:41:04 |
| mei 🌒& | is that helpful? | 22:41:42 |
| ribosomerocker | yep, it seems it's a bug in nix-doom-emacs | 22:43:00 |
| ribosomerocker | do you know of a way of testing stuff in an imperative doom emacs installation? | 22:47:09 |
| ribosomerocker | the last 3 errors shouldn't exist | 22:47:40 |
| ribosomerocker | because i already do enable DeriveAnyClass, but in the .cabal file, which should be read | 22:47:58 |
| mei 🌒& | In reply to @mon:tchncs.de
do you know of a way of testing stuff in an imperative doom emacs installation? well, you can setup an imperative doom with a vanilla nixpkgs emacs and play along :P | 23:03:28 |
| ribosomerocker | yeah, but i have worries that'll have issues because i have NDE and i want to keep NDE emacs on and experiment with an imperative doom at the same time | 23:04:17 |
| mei 🌒& | maybe in a firejail or HOME= or DOOMDIR(? i think?)= | 23:04:36 |
| mei 🌒& | there's probably some way to make the doom cli respect that | 23:04:56 |
