!SlMumQZnFjwLRjWFbW:nixos.org

Nix + Doom Emacs

230 Members
Running Doom Emacs with Nix | You probably want https://github.com/nix-community/nix-doom-emacs47 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
13 Sep 2022
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)indeed it is so: https://github.com/nixos/nix/blob/51712bf0127e995c94a4b598b045d52cf667dcef/src/libstore/build/local-derivation-goal.cc#L146921:52:41
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them) currently here in the nix source for anyone looking too 21:54:23
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) didn't know there's potential impure issues with userns 21:53:50
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) * didn't know there's potential impurity issues with userns 21:53:57
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)i mean there shooouldn't be?21:54:56
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them) hey hey, uname -a? 21:55:31
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)

here:

ckie@cookiemonster ~ -> uname -a
Linux cookiemonster 5.15.59 #1-NixOS SMP Wed Aug 3 10:03:56 UTC 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:55:46
@mon:tchncs.deribosomerocker

about this: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-doom-emacs/pull/266#discussion_r969490245 do you think it's implied? i'd really like to keep it in to at least give users some semblance of knowing what's most recommended

21:55:54
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)
In reply to@ckie:ckie.dev
hey hey, uname -a?
outside of build env?
21:55:06
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)doesn't matter, that's impure21:56:08
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)
~ % uname -a
Linux astolfo 5.15.57.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Jul 27 02:20:31 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:55:21
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)that's the one that's okay?21:56:39
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) they're both the same 21:56:01
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)

[nixos@astolfo:~/home-access]$ uname -a
Linux astolfo 5.15.57.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Jul 27 02:20:31 UTC 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:56:12
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) *
[nixos@astolfo:~/home-access]$ uname -a
Linux astolfo 5.15.57.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Jul 27 02:20:31 UTC 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:56:18
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)I would say you to try something, and them I remember that you're using single-user mode21:58:35
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)yup21:57:47
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)WSL requires single-user mode due to the lack of systemd21:58:14
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) * WSL requires Nix to run in single-user mode due to the lack of systemd as PID 121:58:24
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old) (there are hacks to make systemd as PID 1 which does some user namespace trickery: https://github.com/arkane-systems/genie) 21:59:25
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)can you try using a remote builder to a machine that works maybe?22:00:30
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)This will kinda fuck your setup, but can you try to run the single user mode with root?22:00:30
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)You can chown later :p22:00:40
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)
In reply to@k0kada:matrix.org
This will kinda fuck your setup, but can you try to run the single user mode with root?
np, I can always snapshot
21:59:55
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)let me snapshot real quick22:00:03
@ckie:ckie.devckie (they/them)
In reply to @ckie:ckie.dev
can you try using a remote builder to a machine that works maybe?
i'm hoping that works because otherwise something is veryveryvery wrong
22:01:08
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)
In reply to @yuki:backalley.club
WSL requires Nix to run in single-user mode due to the lack of systemd as PID 1
Do the nix daemon actually require systemd btw?
22:02:20
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)I thought it was just because of the service22:02:30
@yuki:backalley.clubYuki (they/them) (Old)
In reply to@k0kada:matrix.org
Do the nix daemon actually require systemd btw?
It requires it to run as root as far as I know
22:01:39
@k0kada:matrix.orgk0kada (he/him)
In reply to @yuki:backalley.club
It requires it to run as root as far as I know
Yeah, this makes sense, but I think you can run nix daemon with any other supervisor
22:03:03

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9