Colmena | 292 Members | |
| A simple, stateless NixOS deployment tool - https://github.com/zhaofengli/colmena | 101 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb 2022 | ||
| 2.6 | 13:41:31 | |
In reply to @schnecfk:ruhr-uni-bochum.deyeah i thought maybe i had to do this, wasn't sure if it was necessary and i just didnt use right command | 13:42:10 | |
| iirc Buckley changed the approach for the shim, while I found the following solution.
But to have the
in the | 13:44:22 | |
extraModules is not part of value._module.args.modules, so you retain the ability to nixos-rebuild --flake .#hostname build, while also being able to deploy with colmena | 13:45:16 | |
| * iirc Buckley changed the approach for the shim, while I found the following solution.
But to have the
in the | 13:45:44 | |
| perfect- thanks ! | 13:56:59 | |
| 14 Feb 2022 | ||
| 20:14:58 | ||
| 15 Feb 2022 | ||
| 20:41:24 | ||
| 20:41:33 | ||
| 16 Feb 2022 | ||
| [zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli synchronize pull request #58: streaming evaluator: respect eval-nodes-limit | 09:10:45 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli merged pull request #58: streaming evaluator: respect eval-nodes-limit | 09:10:54 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli merged pull request #51: eval.nix: Add "${name}-key.service" units for keys | 18:23:29 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] zhaofengli closed issue #48: Add `${name}-key.service` unit files for `deployment.keys` entries | 18:23:30 | |
| 18 Feb 2022 | ||
| 04:12:20 | ||
| 04:20:45 | ||
| 19 Feb 2022 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] lheckemann opened
issue
#59: add --no-substitute option
| 16:32:57 | |
| [zhaofengli/colmena] cole-h closed pull request #56: WIP: add deployment.nixpkgs option | 19:05:24 | |
| 21 Feb 2022 | ||
| 00:47:29 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] tv42 opened
issue
#60: Using nixosSystem? Flake future?
| 20:06:05 | |
| 22 Feb 2022 | ||
Os there a easy way to acces the merged nixos-config, e.g. to build a vm with it (via nixos-rebuild build-vm or something like it)? | 15:41:28 | |
* Is there a easy way to acces the merged nixos-config, e.g. to build a vm with it (via nixos-rebuild build-vm or something like it)? | 15:42:39 | |
In reply to @n0emis:noemis.meIn the end, you "just" need to evaluate the configuration and get the derivation at the attribute path config.system.build.vm from that evaluation 🙂 | 15:45:21 | |
| As far as I can tell, it's easier with flakes if you use a helper function as I've documented here: https://github.com/zhaofengli/colmena/issues/60#issuecomment-1047199551 | 15:46:11 | |
If you do so, you can access the evaluated configuration within the packages output of the flake - for example, you can reference self.nixosConfigurations.HOSTNAME.config.system.build.vm and add it to the packages attrset | 15:47:10 | |
* If you do so, you can access the evaluated configuration within the packages output of the flake - for example, you can reference self.nixosConfigurations.HOSTNAME.config.system.build.vm and add it to the packages attrset (I'm doing something similar to build aarch64 sd-images) | 15:47:36 | |
| For non-flakes configs, you could just eval-config and get that attribute out of the result, check https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/lib/eval-config.nix for that. But that's probably a bit out of scope for the colmena channel, as it only relies on nixpkgs 🙂 | 15:56:08 | |
| 23 Feb 2022 | ||
[zhaofengli/colmena] utsl42 opened
issue
#61: override deployment.targetUser in CLI
| 19:42:46 | |
| 2 Mar 2022 | ||
| 13:09:06 | ||
| 13:09:24 | ||
| 6 Mar 2022 | ||
there's no way to parallelize/improve the efficiency of the copying path ... to ... stage when using buildOnTarget, right? | 18:42:57 | |