| 26 Nov 2025 |
 K900 | And the number of shares is kind of arbitrary and irrelevant | 17:16:54 |
 whispers (it/fae) | i have been curious, how do y'all actually monitor the status of a staging cycle? is it through the eval results at e.g. https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1820494 or…? | 17:18:45 |
| K900 | Basically that yes | 17:18:59 |
 Marcus | I imagine not a lot of folks want to touch the hydra code base to improve it, given it's catalyst 🙂 | 17:19:57 |
 vcunat | The PRs have some further useful links:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464512 | 17:36:05 |
|  Grimmauld (any/all) joined the room. | 18:09:23 |
|  Yifei Sun joined the room. | 22:32:13 |
|  @stepbrobd:matrix.org left the room. | 22:32:18 |
 ShamrockLee (Yueh-Shun Li) | Dear staging experts,
I'm authoring a rustPlatform.buildRustPackage fix that passes RUSTFLAGS only if specified or needed to prevent shadowing other *_RUSTFLAGS environment variables. (This partially restore the behavior before PR NixOS/nixpkgs#435278.)
Should I choose staging-next as its target branch for this fix? Since the issue also affects the Nixpkgs 25.11 release, should I backport with the backport staging-25.11 label?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/464707
| 22:50:24 |
 leona | staging-next and staging currently don't make a difference time-wise, so for more clarity I suggest staging. | 23:05:01 |
| leona | As this is currently broken in 25.11, a backport to staging-25.11 should also be justified, yes | 23:05:57 |
| 27 Nov 2025 |
|  conatsera joined the room. | 01:16:52 |
| 28 Nov 2025 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) changed their display name from grimmauld (any/all) to musl-official | Grimm | any/all. | 11:35:37 |
| Grimmauld (any/all) changed their display name from musl-official | Grimm | any/all to Grimmauld (any/all). | 11:36:00 |
| K900 | @Yureka (she/her) do you have a consistent repro for the Asahi crash? | 18:37:09 |
 Yureka (she/her) | use firefox | 18:37:29 |
| Yureka (she/her) | browse the web | 18:37:32 |
| Yureka (she/her) | it happens consistently after 5-10 min | 18:37:41 |
| K900 | Yeah I was hoping for something smaller maybe | 18:37:46 |
| Yureka (she/her) | (also earlier, but at the latest 5-10min) | 18:37:52 |
| Yureka (she/her) | I don't think anyone has another repro yet | 18:38:14 |
| K900 | Can you try running it with GALLIUM_REFCNT_LOG=1? | 18:38:16 |
| K900 | Can you try running it with GALLIUM_REFCNT_LOG=refcnt.log? | 18:38:36 |
 dramforever | so i can reproduce it but don't get the file anywhere with this... | 23:51:17 |
| 29 Nov 2025 |
 ghpzin | It needs debug build (in case it was not one), do not think that env var does anything otherwise:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/blob/mesa-25.3.0/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_debug_refcnt.c#L27 | 00:57:22 |
| vcunat | Now I added a gcc15 jobset/eval, as the queue had basically just darwin stuff. | 08:59:53 |
| vcunat | (I'll micromanage if need be, so that it won't slow down e.g. 25.11 builds significantly.) | 09:00:28 |
| dramforever | oh no, oh no i can count the frames now... and it stopped crashing, perhaps because it's not rendering many frames to begin with? | 13:01:59 |
| dramforever | actually i'm going to try running the debug build without refcnt log | 13:04:29 |
| dramforever | would be interesting if it stops crashing | 13:04:43 |
