!UNVBThoJtlIiVwiDjU:nixos.org

Staging

384 Members
Staging merges | Running staging cycles: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Astaging-next+head%3Astaging-next-25.11 | Review Reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/125 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 May 2026
@tbutter:matrix.orgtbutter joined the room.18:05:13
@uku:rei.uku.moejulie changed their display name from uku to julie.18:23:11
20 May 2026
@r-burns:matrix.orgr-burnshttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/52213603:20:34
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverlooks like https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/517138 missed the current staging-next04:29:59
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Thorsøeif this only affects i686 build that has now failed, anything built after that has not been built?04:31:43
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeveri think to avoid git troubles we should just merge 26a26d898abd into staging-next04:36:35
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever* i think to avoid git troubles we should just merge the head of #517138 namely 26a26d898abd into staging-next04:36:49
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever(also posted on pr)04:37:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI don't think it helps git merge troubles, but it seemed cleaner not to have duplicate commits in the history of the same branch.05:39:44
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatSo I remerged it.05:39:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* So I remerged the old commit.05:40:08
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat staging-next merged. 11:50:44
@k900:0upti.meK900UHhh11:51:46
@k900:0upti.meK900Abort11:51:47
@k900:0upti.meK900ABORT11:51:50
@k900:0upti.meK900We have a pretty bad regression for graphical desktops11:52:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaalready merged11:52:27
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa2 mins ago11:52:37
@k900:0upti.meK900Ugh11:52:48
@k900:0upti.meK900 So what the fuck do we do about everyone's xdg autostart being broken 11:53:03
@leona:leona.isleonafix it?11:54:34
@k900:0upti.meK900 Yeah but we don't know what a good fix is 11:54:41
@k900:0upti.meK900 And we probably don't want to ship this staging cycle out before we have that 11:54:55
@k900:0upti.meK900 I have a fix but it's horrible and I don't trust myself enough to send it 11:55:12
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat So should I prevent unstable-small from getting this? 11:59:11
@k900:0upti.meK900I think so11:59:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI wouldn't expect it very relevant to desktop usage, but 🤷11:59:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Well -small is maybe fine, large channels definitely not12:00:09
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahow big is your xdg shit in rebuilds12:00:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabecause we need to eat the staging-next anyhow12:00:26

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6