| 19 Jul 2021 |
 fufexan | David Arnold: can you give me a few pointers on this when you have time? https://github.com/gytis-ivaskevicius/flake-utils-plus/pull/84#discussion_r672162523 | 12:32:45 |
| fufexan | thanks!
| 12:46:33 |
| 20 Jul 2021 |
 @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | David Arnold: can you take another look at that PR? | 15:11:41 |
 David Arnold (blaggacao) | Gytis Ivaskevicius: fufexan what are your thoughts on merge any? this feels like a forward-compatibility layer towards nickel or alternatively a substitute of the module system merge semantics. | 18:14:45 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * Gytis Ivaskevicius: fufexan what are your thoughts on lib.mergeAny? This feels like a forward-compatibility layer towards nickel or alternatively a substitute of the module system merge semantics. | 18:15:01 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * Gytis Ivaskevicius: fufexan what are your thoughts on lib.mergeAny? This feels like a forward-compatibility layer towards nickel or alternatively a substitute of the module system merge semantics. So I wonder if we can give it more concise / niche semantics in the big theater of configuration merging. | 18:15:30 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * Gytis Ivaskevicius: fufexan what are your thoughts on lib.mergeAny? This feels like a forward-compatibility layer towards nickel or alternatively a substitute of the module system merge semantics. So I wonder if we can give it more concise / niche semantics in the big theater of configuration merging. | 18:15:47 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | (also, iirc, mergeAny is not recursive which might bring surprises one day downstream) | 18:22:07 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | I dont think that mergeAny brings much value to existing nixpkgs ecosystem, or atleast I cant think of a usecase for it. And if it does - i feel like it should be copied over nixpkgs | 19:07:03 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Also about that reverse domain, i recently had an issue with it | 19:07:16 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | I wanted to set my work machine hostname to gytis.ivaskevicius | 19:07:36 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | and yeah.... | 19:07:38 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | :/ | 19:07:49 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | In reply to @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org
I wanted to set my work machine hostname to gytis.ivaskevicius I don't think that's a valid hostname label, though. | 19:08:16 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | The RFC label part is only the part between the dots | 19:08:34 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * The DNS RFC label part is only the part between the dots | 19:08:40 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | 🤔 | 19:08:53 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | I thought i saw it somewhere before | 19:09:02 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname | 19:09:10 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | i guess i confused it with something | 19:09:37 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | David Arnold: | 19:09:45 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | (i hate matrix autocompletion) | 19:09:55 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | What's annoying though is that deploy-rs doesn't have fadn semantics, yet. | 19:10:07 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | can you review that PR? | 19:10:08 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | https://github.com/gytis-ivaskevicius/flake-utils-plus/pull/84 | 19:10:21 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Yep, next on my todo list. I'm cought in an infinite recursion. 😂 | 19:10:30 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | 😆 | 19:10:40 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | IN general I really like the cleanup | 19:10:43 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | yeah, me too! | 19:12:54 |
 @teutat3s:pub.solar | In reply to @blaggacao:matrix.org
It was supposed to not conflict, but maybe we need to revise it's implementation? Does someone already have an idea how to do this? I'd be happy to create a PR | 19:12:58 |
