| 15 Sep 2021 |
 @infinidoge:matrix.org | I think I might have actually fixed the problem, and man do I feel stupid. I changed the channel I used from nixos to latest, however in doing that I excluded the overlays containing the stuff that I need, which I think ended up causing those errors. | 17:43:14 |
 Pacman99 | It still seems like there is a bug. You shouldn't have to use a specific channel with bud. Or maybe your nixos channel was just too far behind for bud. | 17:54:30 |
| @infinidoge:matrix.org | Nah it was entirely my fault. I set nixos.hostDefaults.channelName = "latest", and the latest input/channel in the flake didn't have the overlays | 17:59:16 |
| @infinidoge:matrix.org | I changed that before I realized "I can just change nixos to unstable", but I forgot to change it back, which ended up breaking things since the overlays were missing | 17:59:48 |
 @teutat3s:pub.solar | devshell deps are rebuilding after reboots for me, even without me touching the lock file - do you have an idea what could be the reason? I’d like to have the build outputs cached, but it seems they are lost upon reboot. gc? 🤨 | 19:50:44 |
| @teutat3s:pub.solar | I tried adding the —delete-older-than 14d option to gc, will see if that helps | 19:52:30 |
| 16 Sep 2021 |
 ultranix | any reason why nix build for a rust package in devos would produce anything? any way to get something more verbose? | 18:55:12 |
| ultranix | i'm using nvfetcher | 18:55:16 |
| ultranix | trying to use lib.fakeSha256 for CargoSha256 | 18:58:08 |
|  @zrsk:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:30:43 |
| 17 Sep 2021 |
 @timdeh:matrix.org | teutat3s: it looks like we are still using the use flake directive in .envrc. Are you using direnv to enter the shell? If so, one explanation could be that you don't have nix-direnv properly available and so it's falling back to the old use nix directive which does not add the shell as a gc root and so is frequently garbage collected | 00:38:04 |
| @timdeh:matrix.org | ultranix: did you mean to ask wouldn't produce anything? I can't make sense of your question otherwise? | 00:39:14 |
| 18 Sep 2021 |
|  @cw:kernelpanic.cafe joined the room. | 20:50:46 |
| 19 Sep 2021 |
 David Arnold (blaggacao) | https://github.com/fluidattacks/makes/pull/584 - work on bud was the inspiration. | 19:10:11 |
| 20 Sep 2021 |
| @cw:kernelpanic.cafe changed their display name from CornWallace to Rev. CornWallace III. | 06:46:43 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | Hi to all,
just found this project and I think it's really really cool, I was trying to convert my current configuration to this by splitting it into different profiles and suites so then I can add another configuration for my notebook.
I'm doing this from another machine with NixOS. I simply cloned the repository and got the needed tools with nix develop (my system already had Nix with Flakes installed because I use them for single projects).
I manually created a new host for my machine copying a subset of my old configuration.nix but when I run bud rebuild test (or simply bud rebuild I get:
/nix/store/fzl941j3a4i83bjqsk7g3ssfjg9fplj0-nixos-rebuild/bin/nixos-rebuild: line 12: exec: man: not found
This is the line 12.
Any idea?
| 10:31:53 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | If I run man nixos-rebuild (however I can't understand why it's trying to run man, my syntax should be correct) in my shell it works (in the devos development shell too) but it runs another binary in another store's path:
[nixos]$ whereis nixos-rebuild
nixos-rebuild: /nix/store/zq1092igmd5y1jnj7dajifnxkz1gj3p0-system-path/bin/nixos-rebuild
[nixos]$ readlink /nix/store/zq1092igmd5y1jnj7dajifnxkz1gj3p0-system-path/bin/nixos-rebuild
/nix/store/5dkqp5c2v29i0qc9s6qvy7pbpa61fsqi-nixos-rebuild/bin/nixos-rebuild
| 10:39:52 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | I think that the reason is that bud tries to run nixos-rebuild with the --flake option but an version that doesn' | 10:59:11 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | * I think that the reason is that bud tries to run nixos-rebuild with the --flake option but an version that doesn't support flake. | 10:59:33 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | * I think that the reason is that `bud` tries to run `nixos-rebuild` with the `--flake` option but this version that doesn't support flake. | 11:03:53 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | bud runs commands reproducibly in a complete isolated environment. So the only thing that can cause that, is as you correctly deducted, a variation of the binary itself in the nixpkgs version that bud uses. | 12:07:00 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | bud.inputs.follows.nixpkgs = "nixos" (as in recent DevOS) instructs to use the same nixpkgs as uses DevOS as nixos input. | 12:08:58 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | That, in turn is pinned to releas-21.05 by default. | 12:09:42 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | If within this setup, it's not working, then it's a bug. 🤕 | 12:10:01 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | If you're trying to use a different nixos version, it might work if you remove that line with follows since bud itself is pinned to nixos-21.05 if not overridden. | 12:12:06 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | But that assumes that this nixos-21.05' nicos-rebuild is actually compatible with that other nixos version. I wouldn't give an unconditional guarantee, but probably it is. | 12:13:22 |
| @zrsk:matrix.org | In reply to @blaggacao:matrix.org
But that assumes that this nixos-21.05' nicos-rebuild is actually compatible with that other nixos version. I wouldn't give an unconditional guarantee, but probably it is. This would work because this way I'm going to use the nixos-21.05 commit inside the bud's flake.lock, right? | 12:14:26 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Btw., this is one of the reasons why we've been discussing replacing those nixos tools with deploy-rs -- a generic, "flakes-native" profile (incl. system) deployer. | 12:14:27 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | In reply to @zrsk:matrix.org
This would work because this way I'm going to use the nixos-21.05 commit inside the bud's flake.lock, right? Almost: inside devos' flake.lock for the bud input. flake.lock always contains the entire dependency tree. | 12:15:30 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | In this case, that would be duplicate versions of nixpkgs. | 12:15:52 |
