!UUqahLbShAYkkrXmKs:matrix.org

DevOS

37 Members
Seeking help and geeking out together on https://github.com/divnix/devos & https://github.com/divnix/digga10 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
1 Aug 2021
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)* If a module implements a "styled"/"fashioned" or "enhanced" upstream module, it can still made be generically available through an `enable` flage, where the profile then just implements the `enable = true`. Does that make sense?01:45:49
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgI mean, we could just let it be known that profiles are more opinionated and users should pull the source and modify them directly if they want to change them. I just think it could help onboarding more than anything to have a working configuration an import away, and if you mature and decide to change it, just rebase, modify or start from scratch from there.02:43:07
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org Or we could simply make a wrapper around all profiles, to pass mkDefault to all values, making them trivially overridable. 02:44:12
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @timdeh:matrix.org
Or we could simply make a wrapper around all profiles, to pass mkDefault to all values, making them trivially overridable.
That could be an interesting idea ๐Ÿ‘
02:48:12
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) This issue seems to be a recurring problem when resolving merge conflicts on updating from core to develop 04:05:56
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) * This issue seems to be a recurring problem when resolving merge conflicts (the wrong way) on updating from core to develop. It seems logical to keep ones own modifications, but in this case, they need dropping. And rather it needs to be revised if rake leaves does actually rake the same leaves as /module-list.nix and otherwise that folder needs restructuring. A typical issue that is caused by this: https://github.com/divnix/devos/issues/351 04:07:59
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgalso, the iso seems to be broken if any other fileSystem entries exist for root, which would be pretty common if your making one of your system or even the generic host atm.04:34:18
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @timdeh:matrix.org
also, the iso seems to be broken if any other fileSystem entries exist for root, which would be pretty common if your making one of your system or even the generic host atm.
That should be a matter of bumping nicpkgs, see: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131760
04:46:32
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)(it's backported to 21.05)04:47:03
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgis this in nixos-unstable?04:47:19
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgno, only nixpkgs-unstable04:48:31
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Hm, not yet it seems. But already on 21.05 ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿค•๐Ÿ˜Ž04:48:33
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgDoes anyone know the distinction? I'm sure it has something to do with the official hydra cache?04:48:44
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgI know nixos-unstable-small has less packages built by hydra, so it seems to be updating a bit more frequently04:49:46
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org(it has your PR for example)04:50:24
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Ah noo, backport is not merged yet https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/13187604:58:46
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)๐Ÿคฆ04:59:00
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)โณ04:59:55
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)* That should be a matter of bumping nixpkgs, see: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/13176005:00:24
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgNow would be a good time for a round of commit nomination ๐Ÿ˜‰05:00:56
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)๐Ÿ‘05:01:09
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgdoes the iso store the flake that built it in a writable directory?05:01:14
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org (I can just copy self, but I didn't know if we already did this as a convenience) 05:01:37
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @timdeh:matrix.org
does the iso store the flake that built it in a writable directory?
Iirc it's under /iso/devos, don't remember if writable / ro.
05:03:58
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orggot myself a new laptop ๐Ÿ˜ƒ05:04:18
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Where is that commit nomination issue again?05:04:43
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org๐Ÿฅณ https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/50105 ๐ŸŽ‰05:11:24
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Nice tool: https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=13176005:20:20
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org invited @reptarmigam:matrix.orgre-ptarmiganโ„๏ธ๐Ÿฆ๏ธ.05:23:13
@reptarmigam:matrix.orgre-ptarmiganโ„๏ธ๐Ÿฆ๏ธ joined the room.05:23:25

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6