| 26 Jul 2021 |
 @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | do you guys know how ofborg works? would love to execute that job locally | 17:50:51 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | welp | 19:02:32 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | its over | 19:02:34 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131585 | 19:02:35 |
 Pacman99 | This is relevant: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/88 | 22:44:07 |
| Pacman99 | * I guess this is relevant: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/88 | 22:44:18 |
| Pacman99 | I think you would have to start with a warning that the python2 packages are going to be removed | 22:44:42 |
| 27 Jul 2021 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | yeah, I ended up with droping this idea anyways | 04:20:09 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | it is such a pain to pick out all the dependencies | 04:20:18 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | and somehow in the background those dependencies seem to mix and match between 2.7 and 3.x | 04:20:40 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | and you can already see how many of them i have went through, it was such a pain | 04:20:59 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | TL;DR: First we need to see nixops v1 deprecated | 04:21:11 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | then we can talk | 04:21:17 |
 David Arnold (blaggacao) | In reply to @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org
TL;DR: First we need to see nixops v1 deprecated I have an aversion for (state-full) nixops, v1 & v2 | 21:31:54 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | I'm considering the possibility of adding a lib api container to digga, so that we can have a more standardized take on: https://github.com/divnix/devos/blob/8b67cae20a110f296abf91cdba94a3946b1ba647/flake.nix#L92-L94 | 21:34:14 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Such should give sensible guardrails to system-spaced libs, which I apparently happen to be using in every devos env so far. | 21:35:59 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | And if system-spacing is superfluous in a particular case, import memoization would make it cheap to do it anyways. | 21:37:49 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | (that's the Super Stupid Flakes argument to system-space everything by default, btw.) | 21:56:41 |
| 28 Jul 2021 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | This reminds me that Nix impurity removal should be added to that unofficial flakes roadmap. Can anyone send url to that sheet? | 08:35:07 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | I will write something up and will ask to insert it somewhere | 08:35:23 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | https://demo.hedgedoc.org/uyQYTpTVQbyvpdcJ6MvlQg# | 10:22:28 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Although flakes is "purity by default", already. Do you refer to banning impurity outright? | 10:23:10 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | fufexan: the root cause of the error you had about bud having a __functor w.r.t. nix registry option: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/131814 | 12:55:14 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Gytis Ivaskevicius: also affects (until fix is merged and backported) https://github.com/gytis-ivaskevicius/flake-utils-plus/blob/51a82925db31073bc4822c9b538a0a3ebf1134b2/lib/autoRegistry.options.nix#L4 | 12:56:17 |
 @teutat3s:pub.solar | Could someone check if with latest commits on digga/main and devos/develop overlays/overrides.nix still works as expected to override the channel to latest for home-manager packages? Got issues with the home-manager neovim option pulling the version from 21.05 instead of unstable again... 😇
I added neovim-unwrapped to the overrides.nix packages
https://rycee.gitlab.io/home-manager/options.html#opt-programs.neovim.enable
| 13:02:23 |
| @teutat3s:pub.solar | I'd like to get neovim version 0.5.0 from unstable but 0.4.4 gets installed | 13:04:57 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | teutat3s: What's the failure hypothesis? | 13:42:16 |
| @teutat3s:pub.solar | I add neovim-unwrapped to overlays/overrides.nix, but home-manager doesn't seem to pick up the latest channel and pulls in packages from 21.05 regardless. I expected home-manager to follow the overridden channel, too - is that a misunderstanding on my end? | 13:44:16 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | So according to the fup-adapter the overlays get consumed by their respective channel. According to the outputs-builder, the default channel is used as pkgs outside of hosts. | 13:49:34 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * So according to the fup-adapter the overlays get consumed by their respective channel. According to the outputs-builder, the default channel is used as pkgs outside of hosts, that override it. | 13:49:51 |
