| 21 Jul 2021 |
 David Arnold (blaggacao) | * when using nix flake (pure by default) builtins.currentSystem, as an impurity, is not available. | 21:01:46 |
 fufexan | then how should I set the system for pkgs? | 21:02:05 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | I can't say much about the concrete reasons of the above error, though. | 21:02:14 |
| fufexan | I feel like I'm either over-complicating something or overlays are that complicated themselves | 21:02:41 |
| fufexan | maybe I shouldn't do what I want using overlays? | 21:02:53 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | when you use fup you can pass overlays to the channel's overlaysBuilder | 21:03:55 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Then fup will spit out self.pkgs.<channelname> with the overlays applied. | 21:04:20 |
| fufexan | oh, so that will propagate and I will be able to use prev.wine-tkg for example? | 21:04:53 |
| fufexan | I wouldn't want to export those overlays again, but if this makes things easier I don't mind | 21:05:48 |
| fufexan | thanks! | 21:05:50 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | I think self.pkgs is also system scoped so it'd be rather self.pkgs.<system>.<channel> | 21:05:52 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | (didn't double check right now) | 21:06:02 |
| fufexan | sounds right | 21:06:15 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | you can also use digga 🤣👍️ | 21:06:34 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | It tries to make that aspect as simple as it can get: https://digga.divnix.com/api-reference-channels.html#channelsnameoverlays | 21:07:07 |
| fufexan | I will check it out, thanks | 21:11:03 |
| fufexan | oh, I just realized that exportOverlays intelligently figured out those overlays come from an input so it didn't export them again | 21:25:39 |
| fufexan | this is too cool! | 21:25:47 |
| 22 Jul 2021 |
 @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | did we settled down for on exporters naming? | 08:13:28 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Is fup naming more or less the same as devos? | 08:13:50 |
 @kraftnix:matrix.org | In the new changes to digga/devos, is there still a way to access digga's lib? Previously I had some custom modules which used lib.digga.importers.modules (which is now lib.digga.importModules), but it seems that lib.digga no longer contains any actual digga libs when called from within a module in devos. | 14:49:00 |
| @kraftnix:matrix.org | * In the new changes to digga/devos, is there still a way to access digga's lib? Previously I had some custom modules which used lib.digga.importers.modules (which is now lib.digga.importModules), but it seems that lib.digga no longer contains any actual digga libs when called from within a module in devos. | 14:49:36 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Is there anything I could do with this? https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/96 | 15:11:51 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Like what are the next steps? | 15:12:11 |
 @timdeh:matrix.org | That's what I was wondering. I fairly certain we have a meeting at some point, but I have no idea when 😅 | 15:13:47 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Who is supposed to schedule it? | 15:23:56 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Author? | 15:23:59 |
| @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org | Leader? | 15:24:02 |
| @timdeh:matrix.org | Unfortunately I don't know yet. This is my first time participating in a Nix RFC. Perhaps David Arnold knows more? | 15:35:47 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | In reply to @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org
Is fup naming more or less the same as devos? I aligned naming in the most recent commits. All good. | 15:36:49 |
