 | Nix Package Manager development | 837 Members |
| For people hacking on Nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nix Nix maintainers can be reached here. | 180 Servers |
| Nix Package Manager development | 837 Members |
| For people hacking on Nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nix Nix maintainers can be reached here. | 180 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sep 2025 | ||
 @xworld21:matrix.org left the room. | 18:37:24 | |
| 15 Sep 2025 | ||
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | Btw here's the manifistation of this fever dream of mine: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13987 | 00:16:54 |
| 16 Sep 2025 | ||
 getchoo | i think i have a decent solution here: https://github.com/getchoo-contrib/nix/tree/getchoo/dogfood-experimental-installer it currently grabs the artifacts the 0.27.0, but it wouldn't be too hard to extend to fetch from the main branch builds (if they actually uploaded their artifacts)dogfooding even works as well! ...but i did come across an interesting problem | 04:18:02 |
| getchoo | when dogfooding is an enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an 4: Failed to execute command HOME="/root" "/nix/store/dkmylx2wyz9i6ycbmr07lpv15mph0d7y-nix-main-2.32.0pre/bin/nix-store" "--load-db"`` errori traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matching nix-* and runs it, with no checks for if /bin/nix-store actually exists https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/blob/20be610e1f29c8a127146da67ed56f879b173ac6/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L55-L70 | 04:19:47 |
| getchoo | this worked before the component split in 2.29 since there would only be one main nix store path at this point, but now it matches the nix-main store path first, which doesn't a bin dir or any of the nix binaries | 04:21:02 |
| getchoo | i figured this was something probably fixed in an update upstream and i'd need to wait on a rebase, but the code there actually remains entirely the same https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/blob/8a7bb095d93ada552d20d2f22ffd9f1668f8e394/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L56-L69 | 04:22:07 |
| getchoo | i think this might only work because the hash part of the release nix store path happens to be sorted before the other components, while it isn't in the pre-release tarball from the artifacts i'm pushing into this lol | 04:33:40 |
| getchoo | * when dogfooding is enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an 4: Failed to execute command HOME="/root" "/nix/store/dkmylx2wyz9i6ycbmr07lpv15mph0d7y-nix-main-2.32.0pre/bin/nix-store" "--load-db"`` errori traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matching nix-* and runs it, with no checks for if /bin/nix-store actually exists https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/blob/20be610e1f29c8a127146da67ed56f879b173ac6/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L55-L70 | 04:33:57 |
| getchoo | * when dogfooding is enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an 4: Failed to execute command \HOME="/root" "/nix/store/dkmylx2wyz9i6ycbmr07lpv15mph0d7y-nix-main-2.32.0pre/bin/nix-store" "--load-db"`error i traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matchingnix-*and runs it, with no checks for if/bin/nix-store` actually exists https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/blob/20be610e1f29c8a127146da67ed56f879b173ac6/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L55-L70 | 04:34:15 |
| getchoo | * when dogfooding is enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an 4: Failed to execute command \HOME="/root" "/nix/store/dkmylx2wyz9i6ycbmr07lpv15mph0d7y-nix-main-2.32.0pre/bin/nix-store" "--load-db"` error i traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matchingnix-*and runs it, with no checks for if/bin/nix-store` actually exists https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/blob/20be610e1f29c8a127146da67ed56f879b173ac6/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L55-L70 | 04:34:31 |
| getchoo | * when dogfooding is enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an 4: Failed to execute command \HOME="/root" "/nix/store/dkmylx2wyz9i6ycbmr07lpv15mph0d7y-nix-main-2.32.0pre/bin/nix-store" "--load-db"`` error i traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matchingnix-\*and runs it, with no checks for if/bin/nix-store\ actually exists https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/blob/20be610e1f29c8a127146da67ed56f879b173ac6/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L55-L70 | 04:34:42 |
| getchoo | * when dogfooding is enabled with this experimental installer option, you'll end up with an error like this i traced it back to this pretty naive snippet of code that basically just takes the first path in the store matching | 04:35:11 |
| getchoo | does seem to be the case after re-rolling the hash on a new revision. reported it https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/issues/47 and opened up a draft of everything in https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/14002. i'm pretty sure it's in a good state, minus this bug? | 06:13:53 |
| getchoo | * does seem to be the case after re-rolling the hash on a new revision. reported it in https://github.com/NixOS/experimental-nix-installer/issues/47 and opened up a draft of everything in https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/14002. i'm pretty sure it's in a good state, minus this bug? | 06:14:06 |
| getchoo | interesting, lix's fork of the installer doesn't have this issue: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix-installer/src/commit/e4048682396999c11069f99f9b323f1d4a333bbc/src/action/base/setup_default_profile.rs#L57 seems to go back to an earlier implementation that was removed after they forked in https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-installer/commit/16ee60a2f7d5d172db91484729f15dd09d0e5383 | 06:28:04 |
| getchoo | ....nevermind | 06:37:04 |
 Mic92 | getchoo: should we just fix the regex? | 11:22:45 |
| Mic92 | by making it more specific | 11:23:01 |
 matthewcroughan | Why is it git+file and not git+path | 13:27:26 |
 toonn | Extension of the file protocol? | 13:35:23 |
| matthewcroughan | but the argument you pass it, is a path, not a file | 14:27:22 |
| matthewcroughan | git+file:/home/foo is not a file, but this is necessary | 14:27:35 |
| matthewcroughan | it should be git+path:/home/foo | 14:27:49 |
 dramforever | git calls it file https://git-scm.com/book/ms/v2/Git-on-the-Server-The-Protocols | 14:32:20 |
| dramforever | i think path: is a nix invention... probably | 14:33:06 |
| toonn | matthewcroughan: I meant as an extension of the file URI scheme, file:///some/path . | 14:34:48 |
| getchoo | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.iothat’s what i was thinking we could also iterate over the glob matches and use the first one that actually has a /bin/nix subpath as well to be a bit safer (since i really doubt the day will come where we have multiple nix binaries in the store during install) | 16:51:32 |
| getchoo | * this worked before the component split in 2.29 since there would only be one main nix store path at this point, but now it matches the nix-main store path first, which doesn't have a bin dir or any of the nix binaries | 16:52:24 |
| Mic92 | In reply to @getchoo:matrix.orgIs this not just scanning the installation tarball rather the entire nix store? | 20:22:46 |
| Mic92 | I haven't looked to deep into the code. | 20:23:13 |