23 Jul 2025 |
mrdev023 | Please ^^ | 07:50:44 |
dramforever | wrong channel, #nixpkgs-review:nixos.org | 07:51:21 |
mrdev023 | Thx, i didn't know this room exist ^^ | 07:51:48 |
dramforever | uh wait | 07:51:49 |
dramforever | yeah it doesn't i typo'd | 07:51:58 |
dramforever | #review-requests:nixos.org | 07:52:10 |
dramforever | this | 07:52:12 |
mrdev023 | Thx #2 ^^ | 07:52:24 |
| maharshi joined the room. | 14:53:48 |
24 Jul 2025 |
| Keeton Brewster joined the room. | 00:11:02 |
25 Jul 2025 |
fzakaria | When changing CppNix code; i'm surprised tests don't cause a recompiling | 03:29:54 |
fzakaria | I've caught myself forgetting to meson build after some change and thinking : why are my tests still failing | 03:30:07 |
fzakaria | (for the functional tests) | 03:30:24 |
fzakaria | im sure this is :spicy: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13550 | 03:49:07 |
pveierland | I'm working on some URL design to navigate packages within repositories and flakes, where /owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path> can seem sensible when dealing with packages in the root flake. What would be good ways of dealing with navigating to packages in subflakes? Some ideas:
/owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path>?dir=sub (maching flakerefs)
/owner/repo/flake/ref-or-rev/<flake-dir>/package/<attr-path> (using an explicit flake resource type, however this requires resolving possible ambiguity for cases where the subflake resource part may contain / for some reason, or e.g. use a delimiter symbol. Any opinions? :)
| 05:17:02 |
pveierland | * I'm working on some URL design to navigate packages within repositories and flakes, where /owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path> can seem sensible when dealing with packages in the root flake. What would be good ways of dealing with navigating to packages in subflakes? Some ideas:
/owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path>?dir=sub (maching flakerefs)
/owner/repo/flake/ref-or-rev/<flake-dir>/package/<attr-path> (using an explicit flake resource type, however this requires resolving possible ambiguity for cases where the subflake resource part may contain / for some reason, or e.g. use a delimiter symbol.
| 05:17:11 |
pveierland | * I'm working on some URL design to navigate packages within repositories and flakes, where /owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path> can seem sensible when dealing with packages in the root flake. What would be good ways of dealing with navigating to packages in subflakes? Some ideas:
/owner/repo/package/ref-or-rev/<attr-path>?dir=sub (Matching flakerefs)
/owner/repo/flake/ref-or-rev/<flake-dir>/package/<attr-path> (Using an explicit flake resource type, however this requires resolving possible ambiguity for cases where the subflake resource part may contain / for some reason, or e.g. use a delimiter symbol. It could also provide more flexibility wrt. supporting other mechanisms in addition to flakes)
| 05:19:50 |
| @jovalie:matrix.org left the room. | 05:26:10 |
fzakaria | Found another bug + minor improvement to libgit2
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13551 | 05:33:25 |
fzakaria | Can someone let me know how I can test the flake input attrs like "ref" via nix eval | 16:33:10 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | In reply to @fzakaria:one.ems.host Found another bug + minor improvement to libgit2
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13551 As a part of the flakeRef? Those can be specified as a URI query paremeter. | 16:50:40 |
dramforever | ah, test, you mean git+https://something/something.git?ref=somebranch ? | 16:52:40 |
dramforever | * ah, test, you want git+https://something/something.git?ref=somebranch ? | 16:52:46 |
26 Jul 2025 |
fzakaria | i believe i have found a bug with some code that caches the ref | 03:14:24 |
| oak 🏳️🌈♥️ changed their profile picture. | 08:27:08 |
fzakaria | so I want to write a negative test first | 03:14:29 |
fzakaria | so I probably want to evaluate the ref | 03:14:33 |
fzakaria | Here is my self-made repro https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/13556 but I'd like to turn it into a test | 03:36:35 |
Sandro 🐧 | When will nixVersions.latest be bumped to 2.30.X? | 21:00:37 |
| fau changed their display name from blox to fau. | 22:56:40 |