| 4 May 2025 |
 K900 | Yeah that might be a little too old | 10:06:24 |
| K900 | That's three major versions behind | 10:06:32 |
| K900 | And EOL | 10:06:35 |
 martin | ok I'll update and try again^^ | 10:07:08 |
| martin | yay it's working with Firefox 138 :) | 10:10:42 |
| martin | sent a PR :) https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13136 | 10:21:53 |
| martin | How can I build only libexpr with meson? | 10:42:17 |
 roberth | martin: with the flake, nix build .#default.libs.nix-expr. For development, instead of meson compile run ninja src/libexpr/libnixexpr.so or meson test nix-expr-tests (runs unit tests, but most of our coverage is in the functional test suite, i.e. meson test) | 12:00:57 |
|  sinan changed their profile picture. | 18:36:26 |
| sinan | 18:37:04 |
| sinan changed their profile picture. | 18:38:37 |
| sinan | 18:38:45 |
| sinan | 18:38:48 |
| sinan | 18:38:57 |
| sinan | 18:39:38 |
| sinan | 18:41:08 |
| 5 May 2025 |
|  @edsoncsouza:matrix.org left the room. | 09:40:05 |
|  spacecadet joined the room. | 19:16:45 |
 tomberek | Double-checking: multiple-outputs for impure-derivations is not expected to work at this time?
error: derivation '/nix/store/h8vc7ifz5lx8zqgmny0jsdmcyf8123ns-thing.drv' doesn't have expected output 'second' (derivation-goal.cc/resolvedFinished,realisation)
| 21:31:25 |
| 6 May 2025 |
 Winter | fwiw tomberek et al, i'm going to get to #13501 soon -- the issue is just a tad more haunted than i originally thought: the fix is still sane, though! i just want to get a better explanation in-tree. | 06:29:56 |
|  regalk joined the room. | 16:40:43 |
| tomberek | 13051? | 16:59:38 |
| 7 May 2025 |
| Winter | In reply to @tomberek:matrix.org
13051? #13051 | 08:32:27 |
| Winter | * #13051 | 08:32:58 |
| 8 May 2025 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 08:58:04 |
|  98765abc changed their profile picture. | 11:35:00 |
 WeetHet | Now that infra supports lockable tarballs for channel releases, what do you think about adding a channel:name flakeref pointing to channels.nixos.org/name/nixexprs.tar.xz?
Is it too much coupling?
| 20:09:03 |
 leona | I (not part of the nix team nor associated with nix development) wouldn't like the name "channel:" for this, as the concept of a channel is far greater than Nixpkgs and therefore anything channel.nixos.org offers | 20:39:51 |
| 9 May 2025 |
 dramforever | even though it's debatable whether it would be good to add it to flakes, there is precedence for e.g. channel: urls already being that | 01:42:03 |
|  @interacsion:matrix.org left the room. | 08:29:24 |
