| 22 Apr 2025 |
|  Thomas joined the room. | 17:11:37 |
|  griff joined the room. | 19:07:55 |
| 23 Apr 2025 |
|  @slamphear:matrix.org joined the room. | 00:07:12 |
 puck | In reply to @mschwaig:matrix.org
Just asking out of curiosity: Why was string length important to you?
I don't see when that would matter with how they are usually used, so I figure maybe you are doing something unusual. 😅 it's for calculating the length of the final string, post-substitution, so it can be properly seated into the tarball | 12:39:20 |
| @slamphear:matrix.org left the room. | 12:40:10 |
 Martin Schwaighofer | In reply to @puck:puck.moe
it's for calculating the length of the final string, post-substitution, so it can be properly seated into the tarball Ok, I see. Thanks. 😊 | 13:04:10 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @aleksana:mozilla.org
Idea: We should detect a "minimum syscall permission set" that allows Nix to work and make both hydra and ofborg follow this specification. Currently nested containers (for example, nix-build in systemd-nspawn) cannot pass the checkPhase of some packages, but we don't fix it because CI isn't set up as such. The nix sandbox with seccomp defines the minimum set of syscalls already. | 13:24:18 |
| Mic92 | Issue is that your containers syscall set is smaller than set | 13:24:56 |
 aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Issue is that your containers syscall set is smaller than set We should at least throw a warning I guess? | 13:25:26 |
| Mic92 | How would you implement that? | 13:25:50 |
| Mic92 | This something you can do in a test derivation. But I don't think nix should test this | 13:26:55 |
| Mic92 | * This something you can do in a test derivation. But I don't think nix should test this on startup | 13:27:06 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
This something you can do in a test derivation. But I don't think nix should test this Maybe test in Nix installer, and also add to like nix config check? | 13:28:27 |
|  jul1u5 changed their profile picture. | 18:31:40 |
| 24 Apr 2025 |
|  main.hose joined the room. | 18:39:23 |
| 25 Apr 2025 |
|  Benno Fünfstück joined the room. | 15:17:57 |
|  thirdofmay18081814goya joined the room. | 15:18:01 |
| Benno Fünfstück | is there some way to force a value in Nix but then later deallocate everything allocated by this forcing? Or is that fundamentally impossible due to how the evaluator works right now? | 15:23:57 |
| Benno Fünfstück | perhaps I could abuse fork for this... hmm | 15:24:40 |
 emily | well, you can drop all references to it and let it get GC'd | 15:29:27 |
| emily | but generally forced thunks don't go back to being thunks in lazy languages | 15:29:44 |
| Benno Fünfstück | ah yes I suspected this might be the case. thanks | 15:31:48 |
| 26 Apr 2025 |
|  BigBabyThor changed their profile picture. | 15:12:55 |
| BigBabyThor changed their display name from BBTHidden to BigBabyThor. | 15:13:36 |
| BigBabyThor changed their profile picture. | 15:28:47 |
|  haylin joined the room. | 17:57:05 |
| haylin changed their profile picture. | 18:03:19 |
|  @awwpotato:envs.net changed their profile picture. | 19:52:48 |
| 27 Apr 2025 |
|  .. changed their display name from EndureAhead to ... | 23:37:54 |
|  @pablo:taktpraha.cz removed their profile picture. | 23:57:15 |
