| 14 Apr 2025 |
 dramforever | Whatever's generating config.nix didn't expect the tests to be able to run on cross | 10:30:48 |
| dramforever | it's tests/functional/meson.build, but i don't know meson... | 10:34:44 |
| dramforever | actually wait a second should we be running x86-32 builds? can we just run x86-64 builds in the tests? | 10:36:56 |
| dramforever | more generally if building with (build = B, host = H) and H is runnable on B then run checks and inside the checks we run builds with system = B instead of system = H. does this work? just an idea | 10:38:01 |
| dramforever | bonus: ... it seems to fix the gc-auto problem as well? | 10:43:57 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | Oh so this is the nested x86_32 sandbox disallowing x86_64 syscalls? That would totally make sense. | 10:44:00 |
| dramforever | booo that one also doesn't satisfy the seccomp | 10:49:49 |
| dramforever | * booo that one also doesn't satisfy the seccomp rules | 10:49:50 |
| dramforever | i was looking on the issue tracker and apparently it's possible to get it without cross? https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/11284 | 12:21:01 |
| dramforever | but that's also, like, a year ago, so maybe it's just an old bug | 12:23:06 |
| dramforever | does anyone else want to make a issue report for the SIGSYS/"Bad system call" bug | 12:27:45 |
| dramforever | i can't repro this so i'm going to assume this is just an old bug | 12:45:00 |
| dramforever | or maybe wsl specific | 12:45:17 |
| dramforever | at least it's not this sigsys one | 12:45:22 |
| dramforever | * or maybe wsl specific or single user specific | 12:45:34 |
|  zorzem changed their profile picture. | 17:05:34 |
| 15 Apr 2025 |
|  @noskcaj:matrix.org left the room. | 21:30:51 |
| 16 Apr 2025 |
 Martin Schwaighofer | I have a couple of things that I'd like to bring up, which I am not sure if the triage meeting is the appropriate place for.
Is that even happening today?
The issues in question are
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/13037
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/13036
and https://github.com/mschwaig/laut/issues/5#issuecomment-2809751534.
The third one is not even in the Nix repo, but it's something I would like to implement and eventually upstream if it ends up actually working. | 16:59:28 |
|  Deus_YI_∞ changed their display name from dev_el_∞ to deus_el_∞. | 22:49:38 |
| Deus_YI_∞ changed their display name from deus_el_∞ to Deus_YI_∞. | 22:52:09 |
| 17 Apr 2025 |
|  skynet joined the room. | 00:16:14 |
| dramforever | was going through my stuff and discovered that afaict the cross from x86_64 to x86 with tests SIGSYS bug hasn't been filed. here it is: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/13042 | 04:02:22 |
|  @mmkaram:matrix.org left the room. | 04:34:40 |
 John Ericson | https://github.com/joshlf/gherrit my friend just open sourced this, CC Mic92 | 17:57:31 |
| John Ericson | it would be very nice to replace that "depends on" bot with something more sophisticated | 17:58:15 |
 Mic92 | John Ericson: I suppose it depends on the someone restacking pull requests once something is merged manually? | 18:07:42 |
| John Ericson | Mic92: just was told it is a client-side-only thing, so yes I think you are right | 18:08:22 |
| Mic92 | I don't think anyone is opposed if you would use that. It can probably still be combined with the CI statuses from dpulls | 18:10:51 |
| 18 Apr 2025 |
|  void joined the room. | 02:16:31 |
|  Winter joined the room. | 08:57:54 |
