| 12 Apr 2025 |
|  oak 🏳️🌈♥️ changed their display name from oak - mikatammi.fi ÄÄNESTÄ to oak - mikatammi.fi. | 12:55:53 |
| 13 Apr 2025 |
|  @2xsaiko:tchncs.de left the room. | 00:36:10 |
|  @cgbrewster:matrix.org left the room. | 01:26:22 |
 hexa | https://hydra.nixos.org/build/294610683 | 15:45:12 |
| hexa | i686-gnu.nix.x86_64-linux on cross-trunk has been failing since 2022 | 15:45:35 |
| hexa | since nix 2.28.1 it blocks on | 15:46:19 |
| hexa |
[193-194/194] 🌕 nix-functional-tests:main / gc-non-blocking 186482s
| 15:46:21 |
| hexa | now for over 2 days | 15:46:23 |
| hexa | please fix that | 15:46:27 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Or it would be possible to just mark some combinations as broken (say, assert) or conditionally skip tests. | 15:55:58 |
| Vladimír Čunát | ... in case people don't feel like working on 32-bit specific issues a lot. | 15:56:24 |
| 14 Apr 2025 |
 John Ericson | I didn't know we even had hurd cross still | 02:33:58 |
 emily | that's not Hurd, that's i686 Linux | 03:15:53 |
|  sinan changed their profile picture. | 04:24:55 |
| sinan | 04:25:42 |
 @trofi:matrix.org | error: builder for '/build/nix-test/main/nix-channel/store/ydr1gxzbwrxkwy4gp14lkdn6mwwjm2xf-dependencies-input-0.drv' failed due to signal 31 (Bad system call) sounds like a missing syscall in the seccomp sandbox filter. | 05:35:34 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | What Nix is running on the build machine? | 07:00:08 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | (I only see SCMP_ACT_ALLOW and SCMP_ACT_ERRNO in both NixOS/nix and Lix source code, which should not trigger the signal.) | 07:03:13 |
| @trofi:matrix.org | good point | 07:13:39 |
 dramforever | some default action in seccomp? | 07:14:09 |
| dramforever | what package is this | 07:14:17 |
| dramforever | also what architecture | 07:14:51 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | The default action is set to SCMP_ACT_ALLOW in NixOS/nix and SCMP_ACT_ERRNO(ENOSYS) in Lix. | 07:15:09 |
| dramforever | no i mean, even lower level | 07:16:11 |
| dramforever | some other check inside (the (c)bpf program generated by) libseccomp | 07:16:36 |
| dramforever | SCMP_FLTATR_ACT_BADARCH? | 07:19:59 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | x86_32 architecture is allowed on x86_64 in both nixes. | 07:21:08 |
| dramforever | yeah, we need a way to reproduce this | 07:22:24 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | I am currently trying to build the package on a Lix host. | 07:23:11 |
| dramforever | what package is this again? | 07:23:58 |
