| 10 Feb 2025 |
|  Twig. changed their profile picture. | 14:36:05 |
|  @550mg:matrix.org left the room. | 19:59:11 |
| 11 Feb 2025 |
|  -chi left the room. | 20:21:59 |
| 12 Feb 2025 |
|  LinearArray changed their profile picture. | 22:48:30 |
| 13 Feb 2025 |
|  connor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) changed their display name from connor (he/him) (UTC-7) to connor (he/him) (UTC-8). | 06:59:10 |
|  Alice joined the room. | 10:37:22 |
 Sandro 🐧 | I just wanted to poke about https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/6464 and https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/10202
Since thufschmitt stopped working on things, maybe someone else could pick it up? | 13:29:20 |
| 14 Feb 2025 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | I've opened https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/12472 | 00:14:43 |
 John Ericson | Robert Hensing (roberth) I think we would want to expose the individual library packages in nixpkgs? | 00:56:47 |
| John Ericson | at least with the versioned nix attrs, if we think the library structure is too unsable | 00:57:01 |
| John Ericson | e.g. I am updating nix-eval-jobs, and I would like it to only depend on the libraries it actually needs (which, to be fair, is most of them) | 00:57:48 |
| John Ericson | Robert Hensing (roberth): I also got a crazy thing where buildInputs = ... was seemingly ignoring dev, even when I explicitly did .dev! | 01:09:08 |
|  ofalvai joined the room. | 06:30:40 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/5650 Can someone approve this? It is basically entirely cherry-picks, so it just needs a quick glance | 06:33:42 |
| John Ericson | It is a foundation for old-client + new-daemon testing | 06:33:59 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | that seems like an internal .drvPath usage in the CLI then. I figured this might happen, but at least we were able to keep compatibility at the expression level. So basically we'd need https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/6507 or multi-output symlink farming in the everything derivation | 08:44:14 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | We already do, but it's a package attribute containing the package set instead of a scope / package set that sits in pkgs or nixVersions or whatever. Touches on ElvishJerricco 's Monday thread. | 08:48:47 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | I think a package with a package set on top is a decent interface. Ultimately it's the same thing though. Just a different view on the same scope or fixpoint. | 08:50:51 |
|  sinan changed their profile picture. | 12:15:49 |
|  @pdg:matrix.org left the room. | 14:23:10 |
| John Ericson | Robert Hensing (roberth): I am not sure it's a CLI thing, because this is a dep of the devShell in question | 15:59:09 |
| John Ericson | also, I was able to reproduce it in the repl | 15:59:20 |
| John Ericson | (by inspecting buildInputs) | 15:59:29 |
| John Ericson | where is this ElvishJerricco thread? | 16:00:11 |
| John Ericson | I am happy if I can fish out the individual libraries at the nix level | 16:00:35 |
| John Ericson | but I was unsure how to do that | 16:00:39 |
| John Ericson | I just saw the buildEnv nix combined | 16:00:45 |
 ElvishJerricco | https://matrix.to/#/!VRULIdgoKmKPzJZzjj:nixos.org/$mmqRkJU3YQ_icbtXB-Z8CAkRUpjN3FnVULvXlLIyUJo?via=nixos.org&via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev | 16:02:04 |
| ElvishJerricco | oops, replied to the wrong one. but that's the thread he mentioned | 16:02:45 |
| Robert Hensing (roberth) | John Ericson: are you using an alternative client without threading? I could avoid threads if needed if that avoids some confusion | 16:22:45 |
