!VRULIdgoKmKPzJZzjj:nixos.org

Nix Hackers

948 Members
For people hacking on the Nix package manager itself196 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Nov 2024
@enzime:nixos.dev@enzime:nixos.devis there a reason https://nix.dev/manual/nix/stable/ points to 2.18?01:48:35
@enzime:nixos.dev@enzime:nixos.devshould it be pointing to 2.24?01:49:15
@sheeeng:matrix.orgsheeeng joined the room.07:45:19
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)
In reply to @enzime:nixos.dev
is there a reason https://nix.dev/manual/nix/stable/ points to 2.18?
fricklerhandwerk?
09:22:54
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)
In reply to @enzime:nixos.dev
is there a reason https://nix.dev/manual/nix/stable/ points to 2.18?
* maybe fricklerhandwerk knows or could solve it
09:23:28
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilnix.dev has pins that need to be updated09:23:46
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisil
In reply to @enzime:nixos.dev
is there a reason https://nix.dev/manual/nix/stable/ points to 2.18?
See https://github.com/NixOS/nix.dev/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#updating-reference-manuals
09:25:04
@infinisil:matrix.orginfinisilAlthough, it might only change once the new NixOS is released, check out https://github.com/NixOS/nix.dev/blob/master/nix/releases.nix for the logic behind it09:27:42
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk
In reply to @enzime:nixos.dev
is there a reason https://nix.dev/manual/nix/stable/ points to 2.18?
Also see here for what users should see: https://nix.dev/reference/nix-manual
09:30:08
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythat page has "Shipped with the previous stable release" but I thought the support policy was that only the latest version + the version in stable NixOS were supported? so isn't that going to be pointing to the manual for an unsupported version soon?09:36:25
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyin light of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/359215 etc.09:36:52
@matt:1e0.uk@matt:1e0.uk joined the room.22:02:05
@matt:1e0.uk@matt:1e0.uk set a profile picture.22:24:28
@ixlun:matrix.org@ixlun:matrix.org removed their display name Matthew L.22:32:39
@ixlun:matrix.org@ixlun:matrix.org left the room.22:34:16
29 Nov 2024
@lassulus:lassul.uslassulus changed their profile picture.18:29:41
30 Nov 2024
@doomhammer:catgirl.clouddoomhammer joined the room.05:15:34
1 Dec 2024
@tanvir:hackliberty.org@tanvir:hackliberty.org removed their profile picture.17:38:23
@tanvir:hackliberty.org@tanvir:hackliberty.org removed their display name π’•π’‚π’π’—π’Šπ’“.17:41:17
@tanvir:hackliberty.org@tanvir:hackliberty.org left the room.17:45:51
@mmkaram:matrix.org@mmkaram:matrix.org joined the room.21:23:13
@mmkaram:matrix.org@mmkaram:matrix.org changed their display name from Mahdy M. Karam to mmkaram.21:26:55
2 Dec 2024
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlMindaviHas anyone ever benchmarked nix with huge pages? Does it help anything with evaluation?17:24:47
3 Dec 2024
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
that page has "Shipped with the previous stable release" but I thought the support policy was that only the latest version + the version in stable NixOS were supported? so isn't that going to be pointing to the manual for an unsupported version soon?
Uhm yes, but that’s not a contradiction. Just because the previous Nixpkgs release ships Nix 2.18 it doesn’t mean we have to actively support it
14:43:50
4 Dec 2024
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 emily: It would be a bit of a catch-22 if we could never remove a nix version that is still available in the previous nixpkgs version. It took unfortunally a bit to migrate all packages that were using nix 2.18 in nixpkgs. We will support nix 2.24 for sure. 06:59:08
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92I will try to also port all patches back for the important stuff that was still using 2.18 in the release.06:59:47
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 * emily: It would be a bit of a catch-22 if we could never remove a nix version that is still available in the previous nixpkgs version. It took unfortunally a bit to migrate all packages that were using nix 2.18 in nixpkgs. We will support nix 2.24 for sure as this is the version that is used by default. 07:00:07
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 * emily: It would be a bit of a catch-22 if we could never remove a nix version that is still available in the previous nixpkgs version. It took unfortunately a bit to migrate all packages that were using nix 2.18 in nixpkgs. We will support nix 2.24 for sure as this is the version that is used by default. 07:00:18
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Ah that was not the actual thing you asked actually07:02:11
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Well now it seems to point to nix 2.24.07:04:13

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6