| 8 Mar 2025 |
 emily | fwiw Nix 2.3 is also buggy. it just has different bugs. | 18:20:32 |
 WeetHet | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
fwiw Nix 2.3 is also buggy. it just has different bugs. It's simpler | 18:20:43 |
| emily | and I suspect Nixpkgs will not support being evaluated with 2.3 for much longer | 18:20:45 |
| WeetHet | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
and I suspect Nixpkgs will not support being evaluated with 2.3 for much longer Small features can be easily added | 18:21:41 |
| WeetHet | And it's so much easier to fix bugs when touching every code path doesn't break some flake-related stuff | 18:22:20 |
| WeetHet | The other option would be to take Lix's code and tear everything flake-related out of it | 18:27:01 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @weethet:catgirl.cloud
The other option would be to take Lix's code and tear everything flake-related out of it we push it to its own libflakes and then someday we will see how to split it up (while providing it as part of the some normal distribution of Lix obviously) | 18:28:06 |
| WeetHet | Nix 2.3 has 40k sloc, while 2.26 has 89k | 18:44:02 |
| WeetHet | And nix 2.26 has 7 times as many files as nix 2.3 | 18:45:03 |
| raitobezarius | and alas 2.3 is pretty much dead | 18:45:24 |
| raitobezarius | 
Download clipboard.png | 18:45:25 |
| WeetHet | I would expect it to be dead, doesn't mean it's unusable | 18:46:00 |
| WeetHet | And doesn't mean you can't use it as a starting point | 18:46:11 |
|  Qyriad changed their display name from qyriad to Qyriad. | 21:41:03 |
