| 12 Jan 2026 |
 Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | But flakes are kinda 3986 but not really... | 18:41:06 |
 Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | tfw implementing correctly = backwards incompatible with nix | 18:41:32 |
 raitobezarius | no | 18:41:39 |
| raitobezarius | schemes should be generalized and pluggable | 18:41:51 |
 roberth | this part is still experimental fwiw | 18:42:12 |
| roberth | (flakerefs) | 18:42:58 |
| roberth | or is it, because Eelco poked a NIX_PATH hole? | 18:43:18 |
| roberth | :( | 18:43:22 |
| raitobezarius | well, if you put a flakeref in a NIX_PATH, it doesn't require an xp feature | 18:43:31 |
| raitobezarius | but at the boundary, an xp feature will be required | 18:43:35 |
| roberth | it damn well should have... | 18:43:47 |
| raitobezarius | it doesn't matter much in the end | 18:44:06 |
| raitobezarius | flakerefs are theoretically experimental | 18:44:18 |
| raitobezarius | in practice, breaking backward compat of it is not a good idea | 18:44:31 |
| roberth | they're already part of the sediment record | 18:44:40 |
| raitobezarius | flakerefs as a term should die | 18:44:46 |
