| 30 Jul 2025 |
 John Ericson | https://github.com/nlohmann/json/discussions/2612 | 14:57:48 |
| John Ericson | so maybe we should use that for the new derivation format | 14:57:55 |
| John Ericson | canonical and easy to read | 14:58:01 |
| John Ericson | frankly, I don't think non-canonical would cause issues, because it is fine to have fewer cache hits | 14:58:24 |
| John Ericson | but it do feel better with it | 14:58:28 |
| John Ericson | * frankly, I don't think non-canonicity would cause issues, because it is fine to have fewer cache hits | 14:58:49 |
| John Ericson | oh the RFC exists, but nlohmann doesn't yet implement it | 14:59:16 |
