| 6 Apr 2025 |
 p14 | Actually struggling a bit to untangle what is going on and why I can’t apply a patch. Does nix mono exist yet? | 11:55:32 |
 Las | In reply to @flokli:matrix.org
You shouldn't be manually adding your own derivations, especially if you're not also calculating Output paths (correctly) I’m doing dyn drvs | 12:39:18 |
| Las | I don’t want to depend on the nix evaluator in my drv | 12:39:27 |
 emily | (are you sure your problem is not just missing ^*?) | 12:51:09 |
| Las | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
(are you sure your problem is not just missing ^*?) What | 13:25:30 |
| Las | I never considered that | 13:25:41 |
| Las | Why would you need that | 13:25:46 |
| emily | nix build /nix/store/foo.drv builds that drv, …^out builds that output | 13:25:52 |
| emily | there was a warning for it for many releases but it got removed | 13:25:58 |
| emily | the idea is that nix build X always produces X | 13:26:03 |
| emily | so nix build /nix/build/non-drv-store-path will try to substitute that path, e.g. | 13:26:16 |
| Las | Makes sense | 13:37:12 |
| Las | I think it’s a misnomer | 13:37:44 |
| Las | Should be nix realize | 13:37:49 |
 Vladimír Čunát | FYI, some (cross-)builds got broken now on Hydra, e.g.
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/294450042/nixlog/1/tail | 14:59:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I'm a bit surprised myself that -Wundef triggers on preprocessor this way. | 15:00:08 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I suppose you'd simply do #ifdef __APPLE__ and #elif defined(__APPLE__). Most likely easier than fighting what compiler considers a warning. | 15:03:47 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * I suppose you'd simply do #ifdef __APPLE__ and #elif defined(__APPLE__). Most likely it's easier than fighting what compiler considers a warning. | 15:04:00 |
| 7 Apr 2025 |
 SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | In reply to @flokli:matrix.org
It's unfortunate derivations are added as aterm into the store in first place. IMHO they should only be valid for the lifetime of the evaluation itself, and not be put in the store RE: validity
Resolved drvs are ok though, aside from aterm? In the sense their contents are inherently consistent with path. Assuming nix doesn't change. | 06:37:08 |
 Mic92 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/396773 nixVersions.latest: 2.26 -> 2.28 | 11:30:47 |
| Mic92 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/396750 John Ericson nix-eval-jobs: 2.26.0 -> 2.28.0 | 12:14:46 |
 John Ericson | https://gist.github.com/Ericson2314/147281788b3b31cfbd4925dc49e3d59b | 15:15:00 |
| John Ericson | btw | 15:15:02 |
| John Ericson | for fixing headers downstream | 15:15:07 |
| John Ericson | tomberek: Mic92 was wondering about setting up the nix-community build bot for hydra for PRs | 15:34:43 |
| John Ericson | (hehe kinda ironic) | 15:34:49 |
| John Ericson | but this would require changing the nixos org settings | 15:34:55 |
| John Ericson | which I think you have the perms to do? | 15:35:03 |
| Mic92 | we first need to make the github app public in nix-community | 15:36:32 |
| 8 Apr 2025 |
|  @ser:sergevictor.eu joined the room. | 10:15:16 |
