!VRULIdgoKmKPzJZzjj:nixos.org

Nix Package Manager development

854 Members
For people hacking on Nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nix Nix maintainers can be reached here.180 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Oct 2025
@raboof:matrix.orgraboofthings like https://cache.nixos.org/5yzw0vhkyszf2d179m0qfkgxmp5wjjx4.narinfo have no deriver but are in the cache anyway... do those ever get fetched? wouldn't they always be present locally because they're created as part of instantiation?15:26:14
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever you don't have to eval to download stuff from cache.nixos.org, there's nix copy 15:27:54
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever uh, with --substitute-on-destination 15:28:16
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever or you can nix copy --from https://cache.nixos.org a path 15:28:31
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforeverbut the point is no, it won't always be present locally15:28:55
@raboof:matrix.orgraboof right, you can, but I wondered if/when that happens in practice 15:30:58
@dramforever:matrix.orgdramforever --substitute-on-destination definitely happens in practice 15:32:11
@fzakaria:one.ems.hostfzakariaanyone want to pair/hack tonight?20:11:25
@fzakaria:one.ems.hostfzakaria

Question I was confused by Jeremy Fleischman (jfly) :

When calculating store-paths, Nix does "Hashing modulo fixed-output derivations" -- this makes sense since you want the store-path to be stable for multiple drvs for the FOD.

His question:
Can we replace all the inputDrvs with their store-path and also achieve the same thing?
(replace via the same massaging that we do for FODs)

20:54:21
@fzakaria:one.ems.hostfzakariaimage.png
Download image.png
21:04:07
@fzakaria:one.ems.hostfzakariaThe part we are confused about: B.drv may have many different A.drv ; That's OK because eventually A.drv is replaced with A.outPath... BUT C depends on B.drv ... wouldn't that path have changed since the contents of the drv can have N A.drv paths21:04:58
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly) My question is stronger than "can we?". I'm saying "mustn't we?" 21:42:26
19 Oct 2025
@lovesegfault:matrix.orglovesegfault

I'd appreciate some feedback on https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/14298, in particular regarding this:

One open question is that, with this fix, we accept copies of paths with any signature, even if that signature is not trusted. Perhaps we ought to only accept trusted signatures?

01:59:05
@cedricgc:matrix.orgcedricgc joined the room.03:38:04

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6