!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

399 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)93 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Oct 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900 Or $prefix/etc/udev 15:58:14
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossIME15:58:16
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossbut they do often provide an option, and only check for udev.pc if the option is not provided15:58:31
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossand in lots of cases we're already setting that option, so there's nothing to do15:59:01
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rosssystemd.pc / libsystemd.pc is the same distinction btw15:59:27
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossrenaming the udev attribute to libudev for consistentcy might also make things mildly less confusing16:01:17
12 Oct 2024
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross

Jan Tojnarcould I get your review on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/347803? I'm waiting to merge them all at once since they all rebuild basically the same stuff

13:41:57
14 Oct 2024
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat bobby285271: the gnome branch is good enough for the upcoming staging-next iteration, right? 09:52:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat (along with other staging stuff) 09:53:07
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * (along with other staging stuff, so there will be time to fix stuff before it hits master) 09:53:23
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * (along with other staging stuff, so there will be more than a week to fix stuff before it hits master) 09:53:35
@bobby285271:matrix.orgbobby285271 The PR is "in good state" for me, personally. 🤷 I am aware Jan reviewing the branch so I guess I will wait for their feedbacks. 13:30:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat OK, but I wouldn't wait beyond the point when we start the staging-next. Or at least not long beyond. I guess I'd simply merge it myself when starting. 13:52:07
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarI managed to go through the downstream diffs and everything looked great, Bobby did a perfect job.22:21:22
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarSorry I have not been of much help, only gotten around to testing and reviewing again yesterday. I skimmed through about 20% of the upstream diffs and briefly tested it in a VM but probably won't be able to continue until the weekend.22:21:47
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarWill try to test it on my PC during the week but I am okay with merging it as is.22:22:54
@jeff:ocjtech.usJeff FYI I've tried the gnome branch on a couple of systems now and it seems to be working well. I had to disable a couple of packages but those build failures don't seem to be directly related to Gnome. 22:59:17
15 Oct 2024
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián HerediaI have also been running the gnome branch and haven't noticed any issues02:06:45
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Heredia * I have also been running the gnome branch and haven't noticed any issues (other than plugins that don't yet support gnome 47 unu)02:07:08
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiagohello guys13:20:13
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo SantiagoI have a double monitor setup, one that is 21x9 and the other a 4K tv13:21:25
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo SantiagoI wanted to use the 4K tv with 200% scale (otherwise everything looks so tiny I can't even read) but if I do that, the monitor also get 200% scale 13:22:16
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago I read online that per-monitor scaling is gated behind the "scale-monitor-framebuffer" experimental feature 13:22:57
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo SantiagoI tried setting it using home-manager dconf module but it seems to not have any effect, does anyone know what is going on?13:23:20
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago

I can see it being set using dconf dump /:

[org/gnome/mutter]
attach-modal-dialogs=false
dynamic-workspaces=true
edge-tiling=true
experimental-features=['scale-monitor-framebuffer', 'variable-refresh-rate']
overlay-key='Super_L'
workspaces-only-on-primary=true
13:24:05
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiagomy gnome version is 46, which should have this feature13:24:28
@fabianhjr:matrix.orgFabián Herediahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/348874 Some last minute updates to gnome for staging-next Currently building the packages (need to build deps first)20:37:36
16 Oct 2024
@jeff:ocjtech.usJeffRedacted or Malformed Event16:08:50
@jeff:ocjtech.usJeffRedacted or Malformed Event16:09:19
@jeff:ocjtech.usJeff

OK, so can anyone tell me why I'm getting the following when trying to build with staging-next? Trying to get latest Gnome 47 packages without waiting for everything to filter down to unstable...

       error: Package ‘apple-sdk-11.3’ in /nix/store/grs11qimnjqwk2ylkvl51w60d9jf5iqi-source/pkgs/by-name/ap/apple-sdk/package.nix:111 is not available on the requested hostPlatform:
         hostPlatform.config = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
         package.meta.platforms = [
           "x86_64-darwin"
           "i686-darwin"
           "aarch64-darwin"
           "armv7a-darwin"
         ]
16:09:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6