NixOS GNOME - Public Room Timeline

	NixOS GNOME	402 Members
	A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)	93 Servers

Load older messages

Sender	Message	Time
21 Apr 2024
SebTM	Hey, I'm also affacted by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/300933#issuecomment-2061380389 - do you think we should try to patch/backport on our own (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/3475#note_2088824) or wait for gnome-v46?	21:38:58
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	SebTM: I'd like to say we'll be merging next week, I just need to check with people what the right process is to make sure it doesn't cause mass disruption	21:40:15
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	Fwiw the branch right now should be fully cached, so if you switch your system to using 46 you won't even be faced with major rebuilds	21:40:46
SebTM	Thanks will do that to test 🙂	21:41:12
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	Jan Tojnar: I guess related to that, I feel pretty satisfied with the current state of the branch, there's afaik no regressions, open questions/issues in the PR aren't IMO blockers, the jobset finished building just fine. What's next, requesting the jobset get enabled for all platforms, waiting for that to finish, and then hitting merge? Anything else to watch out for?	21:49:47
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	And related related, Lily Foster would you mind if we still include the gst changes as part of the gnome PR, if it can be merged soon? Or would you rather I drop those commits?	21:50:34
Lily Foster	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org And related related, Lily Foster would you mind if we still include the gst changes as part of the gnome PR, if it can be merged soon? Or would you rather I drop those commits? if it'll be merged soon, sure i suppose you can leave them there. i didn't get to opening gst PR friday, but i did get my laptop out a few minutes ago and am working on it right now	21:51:48
Lily Foster	(worst case i can still rebase my local changes on top of merged gnome PR, it's not much of a bother if that's preferable for y'all)	21:52:21
SebTM	Hmpf it seems I'm doing something wrong - do you just use the gnome-46 branch as nixpkgs-input or overlay only gnome.* in your nixpkgs from the branch? I tried the first as I'm currently not depend on any commits on top of unstable or sth but the rebuild cycle directly started for me. Sorry to bother you with this my first time in a that big nixpkgs project ✌🏻	21:59:52
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated	22:02:08
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	In reply to @lily:lily.flowers (worst case i can still rebase my local changes on top of merged gnome PR, it's not much of a bother if that's preferable for y'all) Mostly saves some rebuilds all around, but I'll leave the decision up to you	22:03:46
Lily Foster	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org Mostly saves some rebuilds all around, but I'll leave the decision up to you is the gnome PR going to staging?	22:04:49
Lily Foster	if so, it won't be any more rebuilds if gst PR makes it into staging before next staging-next cycle	22:05:07
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	I think it's more likely to go directly to master? Unless I'm told to do so otherwise	22:05:29
Lily Foster	even if it's a mass rebuild? 👀	22:06:06
Lily Foster	oh well i guess gnome pr has hydra jobsets, so it's already built	22:06:52
Lily Foster	never mind	22:06:56
Lily Foster	it should be going to master, yeah	22:07:01
Lily Foster	(sorry, am rather tired right now... maybe i shouldn't be trying to test stuff and open a PR...)	22:07:25
Lily Foster	so yeah leave it in gnome PR and i'll just PR gst changes to staging after merge (and 6h periodic merge from master -> staging)	22:08:48
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	Cool, and thanks for understanding	22:09:10
Lily Foster	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org Cool, and thanks for understanding yeah sorry, i took several weeks to get around to the gst stuff and didn't mean to step on any toes with the gnome stuff	22:09:37
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do iy again	22:17:10
@maxeaubrey:matrix.org	* Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do it again	22:17:16
Lily Foster	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do it again (i mean i would expect ofborg to ping me on changes too, and you didn't really do anything wrong in this case, i do appreciate that you let me know when you noticed i was working on it <3)	22:18:59
	Colin joined the room.	23:27:38
22 Apr 2024
SebTM	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated Hmm, somehow I'm doing something wrong 🥴 I changed my nixpkgs input to the gnome-46 branch and tested it with other inputs that usually follow nixpkgs to still follow or to follow the up2date unstable - both cases I get about 800 rebuilds (https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/4HKcyfJOyUEbhFHG-v007u1g/) - this is my nix flake info: https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/nwvRpENNeZgk135et1A6slLa/ (Would be awesome if we can figure out my issue if that's ok for you...)	00:19:42
SebTM	In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated * Hmm, somehow I'm doing something wrong 🥴 I changed my nixpkgs input to the gnome-46 branch and tested it with other inputs that usually follow nixpkgs to still follow or to follow the up2date unstable - both cases I get about 800 rebuilds (https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/4HKcyfJOyUEbhFHG-v007u1g/) - this is my nix flake info: https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/nwvRpENNeZgk135et1A6slLa/ (Would be awesome if we can figure out my issue here if that's ok for you...)	00:23:12
uep	Yeah I still get a bunch of stuff being rebuilt too. I think it's not-core-gnome stuff that depends on updated libs	06:17:18
uep	Looking at the one currently running, stuff like graphviz and sane-backends and inkscape	06:18:15

Show newer messages

Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6