| 27 Mar 2024 |
 uep | derp, it looks like at least some of my failures were because the quota on /tmp was too small. | 18:04:12 |
| uep | In reply to @bobby285271:matrix.org
gtk-doc I guess 🙃 pandoc at least, yeah.. pulling in every known format | 18:04:53 |
 ElvishJerricco | In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
If you rebased on something recent-ish and dropped the libxml commit, you should have relatively little to rebuild outside of the updates I included in this rebase. whoo! | 20:29:50 |
| ElvishJerricco | my hydra finished my rebuild this morning | 20:29:57 |
| ElvishJerricco | I'll rebase again and see how much I have to rebuild | 20:30:05 |
| ElvishJerricco | though I wouldn't be surprised if the way I resolved the glib conflict was slightly different, which would cause a fairly massive rebuild IIUC :P | 20:32:17 |
| ElvishJerricco | yea damn. rebuilding glib | 20:52:10 |
 maxine (they/them) | Yeah the one thing I cannot account for is how everyone else rebased :D | 21:11:31 |
| uep | other failures here, so far (also possibly tests, if yours finished)
┃ │ ┌─ ⚠ gtksourceview-5.12.0 failed with exit code 1 after ⏱ 3m45s
┃ │ ├─ ⚠ python3.11-paramiko-3.4.0 failed with exit code 139 after ⏱ 1m26s
| 21:45:44 |
| maxine (they/them) | I've not hit gtksourceview5 problems since upstream fixed issues in 5.11.2 after any of my rebases or bumps, do you have logs? | 21:58:57 |
| maxine (they/them) | I don't think paramiko is likely to be related to the gnome-46 branch, at least not directly | 22:01:31 |
|  @nate-wright:matrix.nwright.tech left the room. | 22:52:32 |
| 28 Mar 2024 |
| ElvishJerricco | maxine: file-roller and webkitgtk-2.42.5+abi=4.0 failed to build when I rebased the the new gnome-46 on nixos-unstable. I re-rebased it on the same base as my rebase (the one that successfully built) and diff'd them. That diff, along with the logs of the failed derivations, is here: https://gist.github.com/ElvishJerricco/aaa05475c94763769124d22427a8f3a7 | 05:40:47 |
| ElvishJerricco | * maxine: file-roller and webkitgtk-2.42.5+abi=4.0 failed to build when I rebased the the new gnome-46 on nixos-unstable. I re-rebased it on the same base as my rebase (the one that successfully built, which was based on a very slightly older master) and diff'd them. That diff, along with the logs of the failed derivations, is here: https://gist.github.com/ElvishJerricco/aaa05475c94763769124d22427a8f3a7 | 05:41:11 |
| ElvishJerricco | are things that are on master but not nixos-unstable required? | 05:42:31 |
|  @smthsweet:the-apothecary.club left the room. | 05:55:48 |
| ElvishJerricco | ok I think other webkit stuff was merged in the meantime so it was probably foolish for me to rebase on nixos-unstable :P I'll try the branch as is | 06:05:13 |
| uep | In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
I've not hit gtksourceview5 problems since upstream fixed issues in 5.11.2 after any of my rebases or bumps, do you have logs? this was before the rebase/bump, sorry. | 07:34:44 |
| uep | now building again from the vanilla branch.. first failure is gjs again
> 31/72 gjs:JS / Introspection ERROR 1.77s killed by signal 5 SIGTRAP
| 07:40:27 |
| maxine (they/them) | ElvishJerricco: file-roller has another commit since then, webkitgtk is in the branch but not in unstable (sorry!) | 08:02:09 |
| maxine (they/them) | The gjs thing is irritating and confusing, I don't quite understand how /proc/self/mountinfo can go missing | 08:02:41 |
| maxine (they/them) | 
Download image.png | 10:04:49 |
| maxine (they/them) | Booted into 46 \o/ | 10:04:50 |
| maxine (they/them) | The only change in my branch diverging from what's in the PR at this stage is disabling gjs tests. | 10:07:00 |
| uep | nice. I get a failure still in swell-foop
> Running phase: patchPhase
> chmod: cannot access 'meson_post_install.py': No such file or directory
| 10:08:08 |
| maxine (they/them) | Pushed a fixup | 10:11:33 |
| maxine (they/them) | If you note down any further failures I'll try to look at tonight. | 10:13:28 |
| uep | I have 104 builds left and they're all behing gjs at this point. There was another the same as swell-foop earlier, but it seems to have been fixed with the earlier rebase/update | 10:15:17 |
| ElvishJerricco | looks like d43b615 succeeded on my gnome-only build, and is now proceeding on my gnome+plasma build. Once my hydra catches up with the two new commits after that, I'll probably be ready to actually try this branch on my machine :) | 12:52:33 |
|  Thatoo joined the room. | 16:29:53 |
