NixOS GNOME | 414 Members | |
| A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...) | 90 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2023 | ||
| 16:00:30 | ||
| 19:36:24 | ||
| 28 Oct 2023 | ||
| 23:14:54 | ||
| 23:18:13 | ||
| 29 Oct 2023 | ||
| Does anybody know what's holding up the inclusion in Hydra? vcunat Do I understand you correctly in that the developers of the PR just need to ask for it to be included, but that they feel it's not the time for that yet? Anything big yet left to merge? | 13:47:28 | |
| nadir: we are probably going to rebase soon so no point in building it on Hydra for now | 14:05:20 | |
| Yes, I'm just waiting for the branch's devs +1 | 14:12:14 | |
| Jan Tojnar: That makes sense. Thank you. | 14:19:51 | |
| 15:10:31 | ||
| 30 Oct 2023 | ||
In reply to @donskifarrell:matrix.orgthis was a GLIBC mismatch. A flake update and a full rebuild fixed it up | 11:38:42 | |
| 1 Nov 2023 | ||
| 07:33:56 | ||
| 09:38:04 | ||
| 2 Nov 2023 | ||
| 08:54:51 | ||
| 08:56:17 | ||
| 3 Nov 2023 | ||
| 13:53:41 | ||
| 20:14:46 | ||
| latest commit on the gnome branch failed to build for me | 20:50:29 | |
| does anyone have a stable-ish commit they use for their own builds? | 20:50:56 | |
| * does anyone have a stable-ish commit they use for their own environments? | 21:07:04 | |
| I've built from the latest commit on the gnome branch and it's working fine. What's the failure you're getting? | 23:23:35 | |
i'm getting > 29/39 tracker:core / ontology-change TIMEOUT 60.01s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM when building tracker-3.6.0 | 23:36:26 | |
| Download tracker-3.6.0.log | 23:39:26 | |
| actually if it builds fine for you it is probably how i am using it in my configuration- i have a member of
| 23:41:02 | |
| anything seem wrong with that? | 23:41:15 | |
| * actually if it builds fine for you it is probably how i am using it in my configuration- i have a member of
| 23:41:36 | |
| 4 Nov 2023 | ||
| That looks fine. I was using that way initially then I had an issue with mismatched GLIBC versions, so I made the gnome branch the primary nixpkgs url (which triggered a massive rebuild) in order to resolve it. I haven't experienced the tracker issue yet but there were some related convos earlier in the chat if you scroll back. The only similar issue was with libsecret, which was caused by 100% CPU usage. I kept restarting the builds and it eventually got there | 00:39:34 | |
| * That looks fine. I was using that way initially then I had an issue with mismatched GLIBC versions, so I made the gnome branch the primary nixpkgs url (which triggered a massive rebuild) in order to resolve it. I haven't experienced the tracker issue yet but there were some related convos earlier in the chat if you scroll back. The only similar issue to yours was with libsecret, which was caused by 100% CPU usage. I kept restarting the builds and it eventually got there | 00:39:43 | |
| alright | 00:48:59 | |
In reply to @donskifarrell:matrix.orgby any chances was the CPU usage error related to a TIMEOUT [...] signal 15 sigterm message? hadn't seen that before this build | 00:52:46 | |
In reply to @shortcutz:matrix.orgAh, just checked and its not quite the same. I was having this issue : https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsecret/-/issues/80 | 01:18:45 | |