| 10 Oct 2025 |
 K900 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/450591 | 07:33:46 |
| K900 | Qt 6.10 moves most of qtwayland into qtbase | 07:34:28 |
| K900 | Except the GNOME decorations plugin | 07:34:48 |
| K900 | I kinda want to drop qtwayland from wrapQtAppsHook, but then you start running into ambient Qt plugin weirdness on GNOME specifically | 07:35:23 |
 jasi 🏳️⚧️ | Is the weirdness just aesthetic or does it affect using the app? | 13:58:53 |
| K900 | Well you'll get the default ugly decorations instead of the GNOME styled ones | 14:04:16 |
| K900 | I'm not sure if there's any actual feature difference | 14:04:32 |
| 11 Oct 2025 |
| jasi 🏳️⚧️ | Then GNOME shouldn't have to hold up this change then. | 00:01:27 |
| jasi 🏳️⚧️ | I don't see GNOME implementing xdg_decoration (server-side decoration) anytime soon so we can look towards https://github.com/FedoraQt/QAdwaitaDecorations for QoL integration (though this should be opt-in for GNOME desktop module users imo) | 00:03:28 |
| 14 Oct 2025 |
|  katja (she/her) left the room. | 13:29:46 |
 Jan Tojnar | I am fine with Qt apps’ CSD looking foreign on GNOME, as long there are some window controls. Vanilla GNOME does not care either. If someone is later interested in installing qtwayland optionally in gnome.nix I would be fine with that too. | 16:45:32 |
| K900 | The thing that kinda fucked me on this is that I can't figure out a good way to install qtwayland | 16:46:32 |
| K900 | Like | 16:46:33 |
| K900 | What's the condition when it needs to exist | 16:46:37 |
| K900 | I guess an extra option like gnome.qtIntegration or w/e? | 16:46:53 |
| K900 | Is the only way I can see | 16:46:58 |
 emily | just unconditionally in GNOME? | 16:47:00 |
| emily | is the closure that big? I'd guess most systems have at least one Qt thing lying around | 16:47:10 |
| K900 | I'm sure we're going to get at least a few people who are going to be mad about Qt dirtying their pure GTK systems | 16:50:10 |
| K900 | 
Download image.png | 16:51:38 |
| K900 | Closure size is Not Great tbh | 16:51:52 |
| K900 | But yeah I think option is the way to go | 16:52:27 |
| emily | default on? | 16:54:44 |
| emily | for the ISO it'll be no increase of course. | 16:54:55 |
| K900 | Yeah probably | 16:56:11 |
| K900 | I mean | 16:56:12 |
| K900 | I'll let @Jan Tojnar make that coll | 16:56:13 |
| K900 | I'll let @Jan Tojnar make that call | 16:56:14 |
| K900 | But I think default on makes sense | 16:56:18 |
| K900 | Unless you really like bradient I guess | 16:56:41 |
