!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

395 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)90 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Oct 2025
@nickorta12:matrix.orgNick joined the room.18:12:51
@arcticfivebeta:matrix.orgArcticFive joined the room.19:24:44
5 Oct 2025
@jaafar:kde.org@jaafar:kde.org joined the room.00:04:46
@jaafar:kde.org@jaafar:kde.org left the room.00:05:09
9 Oct 2025
@notgne2:wizbos.club@notgne2:wizbos.club left the room.20:10:00
10 Oct 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900Hey folks07:33:39
@k900:0upti.meK900 I guess @Jan Tojnar @bobby285271 specifically 07:33:45
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/45059107:33:46
@k900:0upti.meK900Qt 6.10 moves most of qtwayland into qtbase07:34:28
@k900:0upti.meK900Except the GNOME decorations plugin07:34:48
@k900:0upti.meK900I kinda want to drop qtwayland from wrapQtAppsHook, but then you start running into ambient Qt plugin weirdness on GNOME specifically07:35:23
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ Is the weirdness just aesthetic or does it affect using the app? 13:58:53
@k900:0upti.meK900Well you'll get the default ugly decorations instead of the GNOME styled ones14:04:16
@k900:0upti.meK900 I'm not sure if there's any actual feature difference 14:04:32
11 Oct 2025
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ Then GNOME shouldn't have to hold up this change then. 00:01:27
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️I don't see GNOME implementing xdg_decoration (server-side decoration) anytime soon so we can look towards https://github.com/FedoraQt/QAdwaitaDecorations for QoL integration (though this should be opt-in for GNOME desktop module users imo)00:03:28
14 Oct 2025
@katja:zaphyra.eukatja (she/her) left the room.13:29:46
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar I am fine with Qt apps’ CSD looking foreign on GNOME, as long there are some window controls. Vanilla GNOME does not care either. If someone is later interested in installing qtwayland optionally in gnome.nix I would be fine with that too. 16:45:32
@k900:0upti.meK900The thing that kinda fucked me on this is that I can't figure out a good way to install qtwayland16:46:32
@k900:0upti.meK900Like16:46:33
@k900:0upti.meK900What's the condition when it needs to exist16:46:37
@k900:0upti.meK900 I guess an extra option like gnome.qtIntegration or w/e? 16:46:53
@k900:0upti.meK900Is the only way I can see16:46:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyjust unconditionally in GNOME?16:47:00
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyis the closure that big? I'd guess most systems have at least one Qt thing lying around16:47:10
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm sure we're going to get at least a few people who are going to be mad about Qt dirtying their pure GTK systems16:50:10
@k900:0upti.meK900image.png
Download image.png
16:51:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Closure size is Not Great tbh16:51:52
@k900:0upti.meK900But yeah I think option is the way to go16:52:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydefault on?16:54:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6