!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

407 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)95 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Apr 2024
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) Jan Tojnar: I guess related to that, I feel pretty satisfied with the current state of the branch, there's afaik no regressions, open questions/issues in the PR aren't IMO blockers, the jobset finished building just fine. What's next, requesting the jobset get enabled for all platforms, waiting for that to finish, and then hitting merge? Anything else to watch out for? 21:49:47
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) And related related, Lily Foster would you mind if we still include the gst changes as part of the gnome PR, if it can be merged soon? Or would you rather I drop those commits? 21:50:34
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
And related related, Lily Foster would you mind if we still include the gst changes as part of the gnome PR, if it can be merged soon? Or would you rather I drop those commits?
if it'll be merged soon, sure i suppose you can leave them there. i didn't get to opening gst PR friday, but i did get my laptop out a few minutes ago and am working on it right now
21:51:48
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(worst case i can still rebase my local changes on top of merged gnome PR, it's not much of a bother if that's preferable for y'all)21:52:21
@sebtm:lodere.esSebTMHmpf it seems I'm doing something wrong - do you just use the gnome-46 branch as nixpkgs-input or overlay only gnome.* in your nixpkgs from the branch? I tried the first as I'm currently not depend on any commits on top of unstable or sth but the rebuild cycle directly started for me. Sorry to bother you with this my first time in a that big nixpkgs project ✌🏻21:59:52
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated22:02:08
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
(worst case i can still rebase my local changes on top of merged gnome PR, it's not much of a bother if that's preferable for y'all)
Mostly saves some rebuilds all around, but I'll leave the decision up to you
22:03:46
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Mostly saves some rebuilds all around, but I'll leave the decision up to you
is the gnome PR going to staging?
22:04:49
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterif so, it won't be any more rebuilds if gst PR makes it into staging before next staging-next cycle22:05:07
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)I think it's more likely to go directly to master? Unless I'm told to do so otherwise22:05:29
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fostereven if it's a mass rebuild? 👀22:06:06
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosteroh well i guess gnome pr has hydra jobsets, so it's already built22:06:52
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosternever mind22:06:56
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterit should be going to master, yeah22:07:01
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(sorry, am rather tired right now... maybe i shouldn't be trying to test stuff and open a PR...)22:07:25
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterso yeah leave it in gnome PR and i'll just PR gst changes to staging after merge (and 6h periodic merge from master -> staging)22:08:48
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Cool, and thanks for understanding22:09:10
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Cool, and thanks for understanding
yeah sorry, i took several weeks to get around to the gst stuff and didn't mean to step on any toes with the gnome stuff
22:09:37
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do iy again22:17:10
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)* Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do it again22:17:16
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Likewise, I should have checked with you as the maintainer about it, or even opened it as a separate PR a few weeks ago when doing this work first. I think I've learned some rather useful lessons about how to make all of this way less painful in the future, if I ever do it again
(i mean i would expect ofborg to ping me on changes too, and you didn't really do anything wrong in this case, i do appreciate that you let me know when you noticed i was working on it <3)
22:18:59
@colin:uninsane.orgColin joined the room.23:27:38
22 Apr 2024
@sebtm:lodere.esSebTM
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated

Hmm, somehow I'm doing something wrong 🥴 I changed my nixpkgs input to the gnome-46 branch and tested it with other inputs that usually follow nixpkgs to still follow or to follow the up2date unstable - both cases I get about 800 rebuilds (https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/4HKcyfJOyUEbhFHG-v007u1g/) - this is my nix flake info: https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/nwvRpENNeZgk135et1A6slLa/

(Would be awesome if we can figure out my issue if that's ok for you...)

00:19:42
@sebtm:lodere.esSebTM
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
I am running from the branch directly, a lot of the libraries aren't in the gnome namespace so overlaying would be a fair bit more complicated
*

Hmm, somehow I'm doing something wrong 🥴 I changed my nixpkgs input to the gnome-46 branch and tested it with other inputs that usually follow nixpkgs to still follow or to follow the up2date unstable - both cases I get about 800 rebuilds (https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/4HKcyfJOyUEbhFHG-v007u1g/) - this is my nix flake info: https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/nwvRpENNeZgk135et1A6slLa/

(Would be awesome if we can figure out my issue here if that's ok for you...)

00:23:12
@uep:matrix.orguepYeah I still get a bunch of stuff being rebuilt too. I think it's not-core-gnome stuff that depends on updated libs06:17:18
@uep:matrix.orguepLooking at the one currently running, stuff like graphviz and sane-backends and inkscape06:18:15
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Jan Tojnar: I guess related to that, I feel pretty satisfied with the current state of the branch, there's afaik no regressions, open questions/issues in the PR aren't IMO blockers, the jobset finished building just fine. What's next, requesting the jobset get enabled for all platforms, waiting for that to finish, and then hitting merge? Anything else to watch out for?
Yeah, master of minimal rebuilds, I would check with staging folks to be sure.
06:46:57
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarI do not think we built other archs last few times06:47:19
@uep:matrix.orguepit might also be the case that I'm building ahead of hydra, if there was a recent merge/rebase from master, since there's no equivalent of a channel bump delay06:57:03
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) uep SebTM mea culpa, I kicked off the jobset before pushing the gdk-pixbuf bump not after as I had thought. Since that is also in staging I will just drop that commit, but that'll be the culprit of a tonne of rebuilds for both of you. 07:47:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6