!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

406 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...)93 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
1 Apr 2024
@uep:matrix.orguep
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Basically besides libjxl support being a blocker (and currently existing in staging), I think there's no other problems right now. Still need to write release notes too, I suppose.
I can at least help with release notes
23:05:29
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Thanks! All help is welcome. There are some notes in the PR description as to what should be mentioned23:27:14
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar
In reply to @maxeaubrey:matrix.org
Somewhat pertinent question I guess to merging 46 and requesting people test this - where do I request a hydra jobset be added for the gnome branch? cc Jan Tojnar since I figure you definitely know
If you log in into hydra, you can check if you have restart-jobs and cancel-build permissions in Preferences
23:49:25
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnarto run the builds, we will need to change the branch name first in https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/gnome#tabs-configuration23:49:48
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar (we have used gnome branch for past few PRs so that we do not have to change) 23:50:31
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) Ah, that's a shame on my part then, didn't think about that when pushing gnome-46. I do not have (any) permissions, unfortunately. 23:51:54
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarI usually asked in #dev:nixos.org, but I think #infra:nixos.org might be a better place nowadays23:52:17
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Thanks for the explainer. I'll ask in #infra about getting the permissions to do this.23:53:48
2 Apr 2024
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnaroh, and also it is good idea to coordinate the evals with Vladimír or whoever is driving staging-next so that we do not overburden the builders00:03:19
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Ack, good point. Will ask in #staging before doing anything00:04:35
@lotte:chir.rs@lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture.06:56:40
@lotte:chir.rs@lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture.07:34:56
@shalokshalom:kde.org@shalokshalom:kde.org joined the room.13:21:37
@shalokshalom:kde.org@shalokshalom:kde.orgHi there 🙂 The generic ISO profile does currently contain GParted. That means, it is included on the KDE ISO as well. The plan is, to move GParted to your GNOME profile, so that the KDE ISO can be shipped with the KDE Partition Manager then. I dont want to mess up your repo, or send you a PR without communicating that first. Do you agree to that plan and where do you want to put GParted, if yes?13:23:41
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)
In reply to @shalokshalom:kde.org
Hi there 🙂

The generic ISO profile does currently contain GParted. That means, it is included on the KDE ISO as well. The plan is, to move GParted to your GNOME profile, so that the KDE ISO can be shipped with the KDE Partition Manager then.

I dont want to mess up your repo, or send you a PR without communicating that first. Do you agree to that plan and where do you want to put GParted, if yes?
I guess, but wouldn't removing gparted from the base graphical image have the downside of the base graphical image being less useful? That seems like the bigger downside
20:04:24
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)And so I'm not sure that's as much a question for here as it is for whichever team owns graphical images as a whole?20:06:02
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)(if such a team exists, I have no clue)20:06:49
@shalokshalom:kde.org@shalokshalom:kde.orgI am not so familiar with the ISO building process. To my knowledge, there are only two ISOs, one Gnome and one KDE. And when we remove it from the base image, it just goes to the Gnome specific profile 20:25:02
@shalokshalom:kde.org@shalokshalom:kde.orgWho would miss it?20:25:17
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) I'm pretty sure I've built myself a rescue image from just the base forever ago. Regardless, gparted isn't part of gnome, and I'd hazard a guess that it's mostly included in the base config as a "power user" graphical tool. gnome-disk-utility is the equivalent of kde partition manager. I'd try to find the rather place to have this discussion via #dev:nixos.org /discourse, or by just opening a PR and requesting feedback on the change. 20:48:47
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) * I'm pretty sure I've built myself a rescue image from just the base forever ago. Regardless, gparted isn't part of gnome, and I'd hazard a guess that it's mostly included in the base config as a "power user" graphical tool. gnome-disk-utility is the equivalent of kde partition manager. I'd try to find the right place to have this discussion via #dev:nixos.org /discourse, or by just opening a PR and requesting feedback on the change. 20:58:59
@shalokshalom:kde.org@shalokshalom:kde.org left the room.21:52:02
3 Apr 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900I killed the GNOME jobset on Hydra for a bit08:25:06
@k900:0upti.meK900There's a lot of weird looking failures already if anyone wants to take a look08:25:25
@k900:0upti.meK900And unstable is stuck in scheduling heck08:25:43
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them) K900 ⚡️: how can I find the "weird looking" failures? Not clear what to look for from the hydra eval page 08:30:37
@k900:0upti.meK900https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1805401#tabs-now-fail08:32:19
@k900:0upti.meK900Unfortunately not really a good way to filter it down to root failures :(08:32:51
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Aah, what I was looking at. Cool, I'll try to look for something in there tonight, and hope someone beats me to it08:35:13
@maxeaubrey:matrix.orgmaxine (they/them)Thanks08:35:15

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6