NixOS GNOME | 406 Members | |
| A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-Related desktop environments (xfce, cinnamon, pantheon...) | 92 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Jan 2024 | ||
| 10:55:19 | ||
| Hey folks, can someone take a look at an accounts-glib update? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/278673 | 10:55:46 | |
| We're going to need it for Plasma 6 but it also affects Evolution | 10:55:58 | |
| I'm running nixpkgs-review now but it would be nice to also test it at runtime because it hasn't been touched in like 4 years | 10:56:52 | |
| 11:05:49 | ||
| K900 ⚡️: Looking through the history (and I might have missed something) I don't think Evolution still actually uses libaccount-glib, having removed the one service it was used for in 3.31.1 - the only reference I can find to it now is this which just seems to have been missed in cleanup. I think it's probably fine to just drop it - and I don't think we package the plugin it was moved to either. | 14:38:22 | |
Right now, programs.dconf.profiles.user.databases[N].settings has a shallow structure like "org/gnome/desktop/interface". Would it be a good idea to try to change this to support nested attrsets, as in org.gnome.desktop.interface? | 22:47:09 | |
| 23:36:55 | ||
| 23:37:22 | ||
| 5 Jan 2024 | ||
| 00:36:34 | ||
In reply to @rootname:matrix.orgI've had this & gnome wayland session segfaulting immediately. was thinking it was just some misconfiguration. no idea how i diagnose this. my jourmal has lots of errors. | 05:34:54 | |
In reply to @lehmanator:gnulinux.clubHow did you fix it? | 11:03:33 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.orgI do not think it is a good idea. See the PR introducing it for discussion. | 11:47:47 | |
In reply to @rootname:matrix.orgI had a bad ram configuration in my bios | 12:37:21 | |
In reply to @rootname:matrix.orgI havent yet | 13:08:58 | |
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.orgDo you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615. | 23:22:18 | |
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org* Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments. | 23:22:35 | |
| * Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments. Basically, currently we have attrsets above and below the | 23:36:34 | |
| * Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments. Basically, currently we have attrsets above and below the | 23:36:51 | |
| * Do you have a link? I assume it's somewhere in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/234615, but GitHub "helpfully" hides most of the comments. Basically, currently we have attrsets above and below the | 23:37:24 | |
| 6 Jan 2024 | ||
| Hm, is there a way to get GDM to not show a "fingerprint failed" message every time if I have fprintd explicitly disabled for login in pam? | 00:32:51 | |
In reply to @vengmark2:matrix.orgthere was quite a bit of back and forth. If you use Refined GitHub browser extension, you can alt click a collapsed item and it will expand all collapsed items of that type. | 01:41:20 | |
| 06:13:44 | ||
| 14:33:57 | ||
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.orgCool, FYI it's this discussion. The point about duplicate keys is well taken - that should probably be documented so that it doesn't come up again in an issue. | 22:31:27 | |
| l0b0: what do you mean about duplicate keys? | 23:02:30 | |
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.orgThis comment | 23:17:19 | |
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org* This comment - IIUC we can't support that with nested attrsets. | 23:17:55 | |
| oh, right – but since we do not support nested attributes, it is not an issue currently | 23:18:15 | |
In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.orgThat's what I mean - it's a good argument against moving to nested attrsets. | 23:18:36 | |