| 13 Jun 2021 |
 symphorien | they have their own priorities | 20:34:52 |
 Jan Tojnar | well, the other option is essentially forking the project | 20:37:32 |
| symphorien | the patch is fine :) | 20:37:48 |
| symphorien | I just wanted confirmation that it wasn't a nix-side issue | 20:38:25 |
| symphorien | it's sometimes hard to distinguish what is broken in the app and what the weirdness of nixos breaks | 20:38:51 |
| 14 Jun 2021 |
 jonringer | Jan Tojnar: I'm not sure how giomodule.cache gets used, but it has caused some issues with users getting conflicts. Do you mind reviewing: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126810 | 14:59:01 |
| jonringer | I'm open to renaming the hooks, wasn't sure what to call them. | 14:59:24 |
| Jan Tojnar | did not I already? | 14:59:40 |
| jonringer | gconf, and gvfs still have. as a minimal example | 15:00:16 |
| jonringer | * gconf, and gvfs still have them. as a minimal example | 15:00:25 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126810#issuecomment-860503940 | 15:01:24 |
| jonringer | :/ | 15:03:53 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: I wonder why it started causing issues now | 15:10:23 |
| Jan Tojnar | the conflict was always there | 15:10:32 |
| Jan Tojnar | even though the files have no place in being linked to the profile | 15:11:06 |
| 15 Jun 2021 |
|  papojari ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ joined the room. | 16:30:50 |
 piegames | Jan Tojnar: ping on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/124315 | 21:44:41 |
| jonringer | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
even though the files have no place in being linked to the profile looks like the issue was related to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/126141 , just when I was trying to repro the issue did I end up with this | 22:06:37 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: I have seen weird errors about missing files when building the same derivation multiple times but I attributed it to unstable Nix | 22:33:35 |
| Jan Tojnar | definitely looks like a Nix bug, though | 22:33:47 |
| Jan Tojnar | piegames: I will try to look tomorrow | 22:39:53 |
| 20 Jun 2021 |
| piegames | I'm getting Xournal++ crashes depending on how it is installed:
Gtk:ERROR:../gtk/gtkiconhelper.c:494:ensure_surface_for_gicon: assertion failed (error == NULL): Icon 'image-missing' not present in theme Adwaita (gtk-icon-theme-error-quark, 0)
Bail out! Gtk:ERROR:../gtk/gtkiconhelper.c:494:ensure_surface_for_gicon: assertion failed (error == NULL): Icon 'image-missing' not present in theme Adwaita (gtk-icon-theme-error-quark, 0)
| 17:20:43 |
| piegames | This is regardless of the icon theme. I have installed it through nix.shell. On one machine, it works, but I can get it to fail too with --pure. That's why I think this may be a Nix issue. Curiously, tools like gtk3-demo work nevertheless. | 17:22:15 |
| piegames | * This is regardless of the icon theme. I have installed it through nix.shell. On one machine, it works, but I can get it to fail too with --pure. That's why I think this may be a Nix issue. Curiously, applications like gtk3-demo and nautilus work nevertheless. | 17:27:33 |
|  Ronny joined the room. | 19:40:26 |
| 22 Jun 2021 |
| piegames | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/127499 has just broken stable. | 08:14:01 |
|  megamanmalte joined the room. | 09:43:12 |
| 23 Jun 2021 |
 -(๐eloฯ)- | How do you get gnome to detect proper firefox icon? Have had both nightly (mozilla overlay) and developer edition (nixpkgs) produce a stable Firefox icon in applications menu and later launch their own icons with other names | 02:36:45 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | * How do you get gnome to detect proper firefox icon? Have had both nightly (mozilla overlay) and developer edition (nixpkgs) produce a stable Firefox icon in applications menu and later launch their own icons with nightly resp. beta as their title | 02:36:59 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | And another question, how can I edit flat-remix-gtk to make sure user-shells detect the theme and provide shell theme options? | 02:38:26 |
