!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

367 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-adjacent desktop environments (Xfce, Cinnamon, Pantheon...)86 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 May 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydid GTK 5 already drop X11?10:46:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(…did GTK 5 already come out?)10:48:02
@hustlerone:matrix.orghustleroneGTK5 is the equivalent of sixth generation cellular12:01:38
@hustlerone:matrix.orghustleroneit doesn't exist and all we can do is speculate12:02:10
@hustlerone:matrix.orghustleroneit also makes sense that x11 is going away since many features are wayland only12:02:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywell I think they announced X11 is going away for 513:11:24
@katja:zaphyra.eukatja (she/her) joined the room.13:45:42
@katja:ctu.cxkatja (she/her) left the room.13:50:29
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
X11 session going away in GNOME 49. I guess we'll follow?
Upstream will drop it at GNOME 50, so nixpkgs should just follow upstream in that case.
15:28:24
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @normalcea:matrix.org
Upstream will drop it at GNOME 50, so nixpkgs should just follow upstream in that case.
but disabled at compile time by default in 49.
22:45:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyso dropping support is path of least resistance unless we want to add a feature flag that will disappear one release later22:45:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythat's why Fedora made that decision22:45:55
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythe other alternative is to diverge from upstream and turn it on by default which I doubt is desired22:46:20
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
the other alternative is to diverge from upstream and turn it on by default which I doubt is desired
Is gnome going to stay in the xserver namespace by then?
22:47:31
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit already makes little sense for it to be there so I imagine that's an orthogonal migration22:48:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyiirc there's an open issue about that22:48:18
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ That also reminds me that programs.file-roller is enabled in nixos/modules/services/x11/desktop-managers/gnome.nix 22:52:02
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ Is there a special Nix reason for that, because it's not part of core apps and upstream has moved onto using nautilus for archive unpacking. 22:52:25
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ Ubuntu also includes file-roller in their GNOME much to the chagrin of upstream as it is relatively unmaintained. 22:53:30
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ afaik fedora does not include file-roller 22:54:01
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
the other alternative is to diverge from upstream and turn it on by default which I doubt is desired
I think for nixos users, 25.11 can include the xorg session and then 26.05 can fully remove it, so it gives a buffer period to prepare migrating.
22:58:10
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
the other alternative is to diverge from upstream and turn it on by default which I doubt is desired
* I think for nixos users, 25.11 can include the xorg session and then 26.05 can fully remove it, so it gives a buffer period to prepare migrating.
22:58:25
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
the other alternative is to diverge from upstream and turn it on by default which I doubt is desired
* I think for nixos users, 25.11 can include the xorg session and then 26.05 can fully remove it which gives a buffer period for user migration.
22:59:08
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️plasma5 is still kept in nixpkgs23:07:13
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ My main concern is just that we should give users a heads up that the xorg session will be removed 23:11:05
@normalcea:matrix.orgjasi 🏳️‍⚧️ * My main concern is just that I think nixos should give users a heads up that the xorg session will be removed. 23:11:25
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @normalcea:matrix.org
plasma5 is still kept in nixpkgs
it is due for immediate removal for 25.11
23:18:13
26 May 2025
@uep:matrix.orguep
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
it already makes little sense for it to be there so I imagine that's an orthogonal migration
It's technically orthogonal, but a good opportunity for user visibility to make the naming change and give people time to think about other config adjustments before the upgrade
21:58:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily maybe. I imagine most GNOME users are already on Wayland so most of the disruption would be unnecessary (but the option migration should happen at some point anyway so shrug) 22:28:52
@uep:matrix.orguep i mean i've used wayland-only for, i dunno, 10+ years at the very least 22:56:13

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6