| 20 Oct 2023 |
uep | * (and about 1900 downloads total, which since this machine was up-to-date with unstable, suggests they're older non-gnome things I've probably already gc'd - also a bunch of sources of course) | 06:45:08 |
uep | oh, joy - libreoffice via openjdk and gnome-vfs; this will be a while :) | 06:57:32 |
uep | interesting, cairo is being built twice, once for gtk3 with some different options presumably | 06:58:42 |
vcunat | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org So the main question is whether/where to rebase before that happens. Current staging-next might be a good base. There's still significant python package fallout apparently, and I see evolution not getting built right now, but other than that gnome-related stuff looked OK at a quick glance. | 07:12:05 |
vcunat | We'll probably want it in nixpkgs master within days anyway. | 07:12:44 |
vcunat | * We'll probably want it in nixpkgs master within several days anyway. | 07:12:57 |
Jan Tojnar | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org Can you easily guess if it's worth separating and merging earlier? I have not gotten around to reviewing those parts yet | 07:14:44 |
Jan Tojnar | Will try to finish the review on the weekend | 07:15:12 |
Jan Tojnar | In reply to @hubofeverything:bark.lgbt
Reading symbols from /nix/store/mngainxz4xg8mzqgl4028lxij0jhqcpx-tracker-miners-3.5.3/libexec/.tracker-extract-3-wrapped...
(No debugging symbols found in /nix/store/mngainxz4xg8mzqgl4028lxij0jhqcpx-tracker-miners-3.5.3/libexec/.tracker-extract-3-wrapped)
warning: core file may not match specified executable file.
[New LWP 5389]
[New LWP 5393]
[New LWP 5390]
[New LWP 5392]
[New LWP 5391]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/nix/store/whypqfa83z4bsn43n4byvmw80n4mg3r8-glibc-2.37-45/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `/nix/store/mngainxz4xg8mzqgl4028lxij0jhqcpx-tracker-miners-3.5.3/libexec/tracke'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSYS, Bad system call.
#0 <signal handler called>
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fdb2921c840 (LWP 5389))]
(gdb) bt
#0 <signal handler called>
#1 0x00007fdb29db21ab in sched_get_priority_max () from /nix/store/whypqfa83z4bsn43n4byvmw80n4mg3r8-glibc-2.37-45/lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007fdb062e1cb5 in ?? () from /run/opengl-driver/lib/libcuda.so.1
#3 0x00007fdb067df0d2 in ?? () from /run/opengl-driver/lib/libcuda.so.1
#4 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
I guess the next step could be asking upstream in #tracker | 07:19:40 |
Hubble the Wolverine (they/them) | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org I guess the next step could be asking upstream in #tracker There is a precedent issue https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker-miners/-/issues/205 but it's old and I don't know what to add | 11:34:36 |
vcunat | Well, this evolution problem seems work around by a few retries, at least. | 12:18:11 |
vcunat | * Well, this evolution problem seems workerd around by a few retries, at least. | 12:18:16 |
vcunat | * Well, this evolution problem seems worked around by a few retries, at least. | 12:18:19 |
| 21 Oct 2023 |
Hubble the Wolverine (they/them) | I'm trying to think but I'm still worried that they will be asking questions about nixos that I can't answer | 00:54:53 |
Hubble the Wolverine (they/them) | and then blame it on that | 00:54:58 |
Hubble the Wolverine (they/them) | That's my social anxiety talking | 04:55:16 |
piegames | Help, my git got out of control and I fucked up and don't know what is happening | 07:31:15 |
piegames | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/247766 | 07:31:18 |
piegames | I just wanted to push a small fixup :/ | 07:31:48 |
piegames | Oooh I understand, my local branch name did not match but I had an old branch called gnome lying around, so git pushed that instead. Should be fixed now, hopefully | 07:35:53 |
vcunat | Yes, looks fixed to me. Last commit my git saw was aa6f1d8d579b and that's what is there, with four of your commits added on top. | 07:42:41 |
vcunat | So the gnome-extensions branch in the official repo should be removed? (same commit right now) | 07:44:26 |
piegames | In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org So the gnome-extensions branch in the official repo should be removed? (same commit right now) Already done, yes | 08:01:47 |
piegames | Or can you still see it? | 08:01:58 |
| @saolof:envs.net left the room. | 08:02:13 |
vcunat | Ah, right. The thing is that my fetches don't --prune by default. | 08:03:44 |
vcunat | I didn't realize. | 08:03:56 |
vcunat | GitHub says that you did delete it 30 minutes ago. | 08:04:17 |
piegames | Yeah I always use git fetch --all --prune | 08:04:29 |
Jan Tojnar | In reply to @hubofeverything:bark.lgbt There is a precedent issue https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker-miners/-/issues/205 but it's old and I don't know what to add probably a new issue is in order, since other component might be pulling it in. Feel free to cc me and I can help. | 20:46:02 |