| 13 Jul 2021 |
piegames | The only one with commit access, AFAICT | 19:20:22 |
Jan Tojnar | -(𝕂eloτ)-: we have few other people working on it as well https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/cea6f61f2e31c56e3fc746231ad797436f6bbe9f/maintainers/team-list.nix#L105-L110 | 21:02:49 |
Jan Tojnar | hedning has commit access too | 21:03:03 |
Jan Tojnar | (though they mostly just work on updates | 21:03:26 |
Jan Tojnar | * (though they mostly just work on major updates | 21:03:35 |
-(𝕂eloτ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org -(𝕂eloτ)-: we have few other people working on it as well https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/cea6f61f2e31c56e3fc746231ad797436f6bbe9f/maintainers/team-list.nix#L105-L110 Good to hear that, thought there was a shortage in maintainers | 22:23:37 |
piegames | There is, IMO. I mean we get along, but we can use any helping hand. | 22:38:57 |
Jan Tojnar | -(𝕂eloτ)-: GNOME ecosystem is big so four people is not nearly enough, especially since they all work in free time | 22:49:18 |
Jan Tojnar | * -(𝕂eloτ)-: GNOME ecosystem is big so four people is not nearly enough, especially since they all work on it in their free time | 22:49:37 |
Jan Tojnar | it also builds on many other libraries (freedesktop) which is mostly maintained in a drive-by fashion and could use dedicated maintainers too | 22:51:27 |
-(𝕂eloτ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org -(𝕂eloτ)-: GNOME ecosystem is big so four people is not nearly enough, especially since they all work on it in their free time My thought exactly, might contribute in the future when I am more experienced! | 22:58:37 |
| 14 Jul 2021 |
Jan Tojnar | piegames: I would still want to split the extensionRenames into more sections | 00:41:59 |
Jan Tojnar | since the comment is confusing as is | 00:42:06 |
piegames | Okay. What sections? | 00:42:14 |
Jan Tojnar | I mean the comment about gradually automating | 00:42:34 |
piegames | Should these sections be syntactically be represented in Nix or would some more aggressive formatting suffice? | 00:42:53 |
Jan Tojnar | the section below it mixes already automated with the three or so manual packages | 00:43:04 |
Jan Tojnar | just formatting and comment should be enough IMO | 00:43:20 |
Jan Tojnar | piegames: Something like "These are manually packaged extensions that have different attribute name from the slug on the extension portal." | 00:44:01 |
Jan Tojnar | And would drop the "gradually being replaced by automatic packaging where possible" part since it contradicts the past tense of "were manually packaged" IIUC | 00:45:33 |
Jan Tojnar | piegames: also I am confused by paperwm | 00:52:09 |
piegames | Same | 00:52:14 |
Jan Tojnar | you have it in automatically packaged section but it is not on the portal? | 00:52:28 |
Jan Tojnar | should not it be in the manual section then? | 00:52:46 |
piegames | Yeah, I think the commit dropping the manual packaging was a mistake and should be dropped | 00:54:42 |
piegames | It's a lot of repetitive work and I do really silly mistakes :/ | 00:55:18 |
Jan Tojnar | well, now the rest of the code does not count with the removed packages so I would probably just reinstate the paperwm expression | 00:58:11 |
Jan Tojnar | hopefully, that will not be too much work | 00:58:26 |
piegames | Already pushed. I just hope I haven't forgotten any of the changes | 00:58:57 |
Jan Tojnar | This one is still there https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/124315/files#r669203034 | 01:03:01 |