| 14 Jun 2021 |
 Jan Tojnar | did not I already? | 14:59:40 |
 jonringer | gconf, and gvfs still have. as a minimal example | 15:00:16 |
| jonringer | * gconf, and gvfs still have them. as a minimal example | 15:00:25 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126810#issuecomment-860503940 | 15:01:24 |
| jonringer | :/ | 15:03:53 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: I wonder why it started causing issues now | 15:10:23 |
| Jan Tojnar | the conflict was always there | 15:10:32 |
| Jan Tojnar | even though the files have no place in being linked to the profile | 15:11:06 |
| 15 Jun 2021 |
|  papojari joined the room. | 16:30:50 |
 piegames | Jan Tojnar: ping on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/124315 | 21:44:41 |
| jonringer | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
even though the files have no place in being linked to the profile looks like the issue was related to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/126141 , just when I was trying to repro the issue did I end up with this | 22:06:37 |
| Jan Tojnar | jonringer: I have seen weird errors about missing files when building the same derivation multiple times but I attributed it to unstable Nix | 22:33:35 |
| Jan Tojnar | definitely looks like a Nix bug, though | 22:33:47 |
| Jan Tojnar | piegames: I will try to look tomorrow | 22:39:53 |
| 20 Jun 2021 |
| piegames | I'm getting Xournal++ crashes depending on how it is installed:
Gtk:ERROR:../gtk/gtkiconhelper.c:494:ensure_surface_for_gicon: assertion failed (error == NULL): Icon 'image-missing' not present in theme Adwaita (gtk-icon-theme-error-quark, 0)
Bail out! Gtk:ERROR:../gtk/gtkiconhelper.c:494:ensure_surface_for_gicon: assertion failed (error == NULL): Icon 'image-missing' not present in theme Adwaita (gtk-icon-theme-error-quark, 0)
| 17:20:43 |
| piegames | This is regardless of the icon theme. I have installed it through nix.shell. On one machine, it works, but I can get it to fail too with --pure. That's why I think this may be a Nix issue. Curiously, tools like gtk3-demo work nevertheless. | 17:22:15 |
| piegames | * This is regardless of the icon theme. I have installed it through nix.shell. On one machine, it works, but I can get it to fail too with --pure. That's why I think this may be a Nix issue. Curiously, applications like gtk3-demo and nautilus work nevertheless. | 17:27:33 |
|  Ronny joined the room. | 19:40:26 |
| 22 Jun 2021 |
| piegames | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/127499 has just broken stable. | 08:14:01 |
|  megamanmalte joined the room. | 09:43:12 |
| 23 Jun 2021 |
 -(๐eloฯ)- | How do you get gnome to detect proper firefox icon? Have had both nightly (mozilla overlay) and developer edition (nixpkgs) produce a stable Firefox icon in applications menu and later launch their own icons with other names | 02:36:45 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | * How do you get gnome to detect proper firefox icon? Have had both nightly (mozilla overlay) and developer edition (nixpkgs) produce a stable Firefox icon in applications menu and later launch their own icons with nightly resp. beta as their title | 02:36:59 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | And another question, how can I edit flat-remix-gtk to make sure user-shells detect the theme and provide shell theme options? | 02:38:26 |
|  tnias joined the room. | 14:39:36 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: check wmclass (press alt-f2, type lg) | 15:57:04 |
| Jan Tojnar | it should match the desktop file wmclass | 15:57:25 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: the package does not seem to contain share/themes/gnome-shell | 15:59:53 |
| Jan Tojnar | so you should check the project's build system to see what conditions need to be met for that to be installed | 16:00:31 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- |
so you should check the project's build system to see what conditions need to be met for that to be installed
Then the nixpkg needs to be updated since the arch package was providing gnome-shell theme as expected
| 16:01:08 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- |
it should match the desktop file wmclass
Will do that now and report back, appreciate it!
| 16:01:21 |
