| 14 Jul 2021 |
 piegames | Yeah, I think the commit dropping the manual packaging was a mistake and should be dropped | 00:54:42 |
| piegames | It's a lot of repetitive work and I do really silly mistakes :/ | 00:55:18 |
 Jan Tojnar | well, now the rest of the code does not count with the removed packages so I would probably just reinstate the paperwm expression | 00:58:11 |
| Jan Tojnar | hopefully, that will not be too much work | 00:58:26 |
| piegames | Already pushed. I just hope I haven't forgotten any of the changes | 00:58:57 |
| Jan Tojnar | This one is still there https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/124315/files#r669203034 | 01:03:01 |
| Jan Tojnar | piegames: otherwise it looks to me fine once the fixup commits are squashed | 01:03:34 |
| piegames | Yeah I just noticed too that I totally forgot about that one | 01:03:51 |
| piegames | Now some of your comments make a lot more sense ^^ | 01:04:00 |
| piegames | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
piegames: otherwise it looks to me fine once the fixup commits are squashed Any whishes regarding commit history cleanup? | 01:04:58 |
| Jan Tojnar | looks reasonably granular to me | 01:06:01 |
| Jan Tojnar | though I guess the removals should come before the other changes | 01:06:57 |
| Jan Tojnar | since the removed expressions do not have the changes made to them | 01:07:17 |
| Jan Tojnar | hmm, they actually remove the lines in changed manuallyPackaged.nix | 01:09:09 |
| Jan Tojnar | that makes it awkward | 01:09:16 |
| piegames | Exactly. I'll see what I can do | 01:09:34 |
| piegames | Jan Tojnar: Please have a look if this is okay. Technically, the order is inconsistent, but at least there is no squash conflict anymore. | 01:25:29 |
| Jan Tojnar | piegames: looks great now | 01:34:00 |
| Jan Tojnar | it might not eval in between the commits but probably not worth to fix it | 01:34:33 |
 hmenke | There is a small "problem" with fingerprint authentication on NixOS 21.05. Whenever I'm at login screen (GDM, screensaver) I'm greeted with “Sorry, fingerprint authentication didn't work” before I have even put my finger on the sensor. When I eventually touch the sensor it works anyway, but the false error message is a bit annoying. | 07:33:58 |
| hmenke | Here is a related thread on Discourse: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/gnome-login-fingerprint-issue/13760 | 07:35:05 |
 -(𝕂eloτ)- | 40.3 released! | 10:38:14 |
| -(𝕂eloτ)- | * Gnome 40.3 released! | 10:39:29 |
| piegames | I went through all open PRs regarding gnome extensions and did some cleanup. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/129932 is ready to merge | 13:24:19 |
| piegames | * I went through all open PRs regarding gnome extensions and did some cleanup. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/129932 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/124773 are ready to merge | 13:25:16 |
| 15 Jul 2021 |
| Jan Tojnar | In reply to @hmenke:matrix.org
Here is a related thread on Discourse: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/gnome-login-fingerprint-issue/13760 Yeah, I know about it, it was there from the start (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/117081#issuecomment-834205394) but I do not have any hardware where I could reproduce it and the logs do not seem very helpful | 14:46:32 |
| hmenke | Jan Tojnar: What do you think would be a promising target to investigate? (maybe gdm?) The fprintd logs look innocent, even with `G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all`. | 14:54:43 |
| Jan Tojnar | hmenke: anything fr | 17:26:30 |
| Jan Tojnar | * hmenke: anything from gdm, through pam to fprint may be responsible | 17:27:05 |
| Jan Tojnar | I am not very familiar with this part of the stack, unfortunately | 17:27:34 |
