| 23 Jun 2021 |
 Jan Tojnar | * That is likely, try opening an issue and cc'ing the maintainer. | 16:07:03 |
 -(๐eloฯ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
That is likely, try opening an issue and cc'ing the maintainer. Don't think the maintainer knows how, mentioned it earlier in the nix channel and he mentioned that he had been waiting for someone to make a commit but nothing was ever made -> pushed to master branch | 16:07:26 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Might have to do it myself after I figure out how to | 16:07:36 |
| Jan Tojnar | if the project uses autotools, check for mention of gnome-shell in configure.ac | 16:08:31 |
| Jan Tojnar | similar for meson (check meson.build) | 16:08:46 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | This is how FF used to look like before I had installed dev-edition | 16:08:50 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | 
Download image.png | 16:08:52 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | And also there is no option for "Open Private Window" | 16:09:23 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | * And also there is no option for "Open Private Window", even now | 16:09:29 |
| Jan Tojnar | yeah, I have experienced the issue in the past โ it was caused by wmclass mismatch | 16:09:35 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | 
Download image.png | 16:09:44 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Is gnome the issue? Or the packaging? | 16:10:03 |
| Jan Tojnar | packaging | 16:10:10 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Created this not so long ago, hopefully they will look at it | 16:10:38 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Appreciate the help Jan! ๐ฏ | 16:11:50 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: I am almost certain it has been fixed in nixpkgs in the past but cannot find the issue/PR in Nixpkgs | 16:15:29 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
-(GNU/โฯ)-: I am almost certain it has been fixed in nixpkgs in the past but cannot find the issue/PR in Nixpkgs The dev-edition I tested was from nixpkgs and it was faulty too | 16:16:06 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: only for pale moon https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/9ebc740e96ae89d77617ca704475e72403822cdd/pkgs/applications/networking/browsers/palemoon/default.nix#L195-L198 | 16:16:11 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | This should be a PR for all editions imo | 16:16:31 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Jan Tojnar: Should I create an issue about the icons in nixpkgs? Or do you have another plan in mind? | 20:03:22 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: for the devedition, please do | 22:36:37 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
-(GNU/โฯ)-: for the devedition, please do Will do that now! | 22:42:38 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | I will also include the link you mentioned earlier and quote you if you don't mind | 22:42:56 |
| Jan Tojnar | feel free | 22:54:35 |
| Jan Tojnar | * -(GNU/โฯ)-: feel free | 22:54:51 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Have to uninstall current edition though due to conflicts :/ | 23:00:29 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | Will do it for the sake of improving FF why not | 23:00:39 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | What should I put in this section?
Maintainer information:
# a list of nixpkgs attributes affected by the problem
attribute:
# a list of nixos modules affected by the problem
module:
| 23:49:51 |
| 24 Jun 2021 |
| Jan Tojnar | -(GNU/โฯ)-: check who is maintainer of firefox-devedition | 00:43:02 |
| -(๐eloฯ)- | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
-(GNU/โฯ)-: check who is maintainer of firefox-devedition Mentioned the names of the last two contributors in the notification section, don't think re-pining would be necessary | 00:49:38 |
