!XQQVyIbcAcHFvzmcTl:nixos.org

NixOS GNOME

385 Members
A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-adjacent desktop environments (Xfce, Cinnamon, Pantheon...)86 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
14 Oct 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900Or rather21:25:05
@k900:0upti.meK900It does a bunch of weird and somewhat unrelated things21:25:05
@k900:0upti.meK900But currently window decorations are not one of those thiings21:25:47
@k900:0upti.meK900And in practice it will just do nothing on most setups because most setups are SSD21:26:04
@normalcea:matrix.org@normalcea:matrix.org Then I still think GNOME shouldn't hold up dropping qtwayland from the wrapper hook. 21:27:17
@normalcea:matrix.org@normalcea:matrix.orgIt seems to me that GNOME either has to implement SSD or Qt needs to funnel the GNOME CSD into qtbase.21:28:11
@normalcea:matrix.org@normalcea:matrix.orgIn any case, GNOME users should be used to this by now21:28:18
@normalcea:matrix.org@normalcea:matrix.org * It seems to me that GNOME either has to implement SSD or Qt needs to funnel the GNOME CSD into qtbase in a future release or so. 21:28:57
@k900:0upti.meK900Well if anyone wants to volunteer themselves to rewrite the GNOME CSD plugin to use QPainter21:29:02
@k900:0upti.meK900 Then I'm sure the Qt people will be interested 21:29:02
@k900:0upti.meK900 But also, again, I don't think there's any significant problems with dropping it from the hook, the question is whether we want to make it so the default GNOME setups include the plugin 21:30:34
@k900:0upti.meK900 And if yes, how 21:30:34

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6