| 15 May 2024 |
 Jan Tojnar | bendlas: you should still be able to use buildPythonApplication with pyproject = false | 07:25:03 |
 bendlas | Jan Tojnar: Didn't work, unfortunately: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311780#discussion_r1601277931 | 09:18:35 |
| bendlas | Seems that buildPythonApplication seems to somehow mess up GI_TYPELIB_PATH: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311780#discussion_r1601451210
I'll go with the manual wrapping for now .... | 11:25:42 |
| 16 May 2024 |
|  piegames left the room. | 18:55:55 |
| 17 May 2024 |
 SebTM | Hey, someone has time to do a quick approval? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311480 | 16:36:36 |
| 18 May 2024 |
|  @tiagoporsch:matrix.org removed their display name tiagoporsch. | 03:15:50 |
| @tiagoporsch:matrix.org left the room. | 03:15:50 |
|  @arcayr:rascals.net left the room. | 08:13:36 |
| 22 May 2024 |
|  @laander:matrix.org left the room. | 01:01:43 |
|  NixOS Moderation Bot banned  @5m5z3q888q5prxkg:chat.lightnovel-dungeon.de (Suspended until 2024-05-29). | 11:45:53 |
| NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 15:25:58 |
| NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 15:28:13 |
| 23 May 2024 |
|  diamond (it/its) changed their profile picture. | 17:43:26 |
| 24 May 2024 |
| diamond (it/its) changed their profile picture. | 01:48:58 |
|  @lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture. | 06:32:47 |
 hexa | is anyone taking care of gnome-remote-desktop? | 10:57:44 |
| hexa | https://vulners.com/redhatcve/RH:CVE-2024-5148 | 10:58:38 |
| 25 May 2024 |
| Jan Tojnar | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://vulners.com/redhatcve/RH:CVE-2024-5148 thanks, looking into it now | 17:39:40 |
| Jan Tojnar | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://vulners.com/redhatcve/RH:CVE-2024-5148 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/314666 beat me to it | 20:26:58 |
| hexa | Thomas 💜 | 20:28:00 |
| SebTM | Hey, someone willing to-do review for this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311480
Posted second time now in discourse today | 20:40:19 |
| SebTM | * Hey, someone open to-do review for this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311480
Posted second time now in discourse today | 20:43:16 |
| SebTM | * Hey, someone open to review for this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311480
Posted second time now in discourse today | 20:43:20 |
| SebTM | * Hey, someone open to review this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/311480
Posted second time now in discourse today | 20:43:24 |
| Jan Tojnar | I believe the extensions are unmaintained now | 21:28:19 |
| 26 May 2024 |
| SebTM | So I can just merge it on my own because it only can get better? 😄 | 00:51:33 |
| SebTM | * So I can just merge it on my own (without review) because it only can get better? 😄 | 00:51:44 |
| SebTM | * So I can just merge it on my own (without review) because it only can get better? 😄
I don't really care, I can just update my nixpkgs-fork but then I might just stop upstreaming it if there is not a high chance to get it merged in the end. | 00:52:50 |
| SebTM | * So I can just merge it on my own (without review) because it only can get better? 😄
I mean, I don't really care (about the merge), I can just keep my nixpkgs-fork up2date but then I might just stop upstreaming it if there is no chance to get a review/merged. | 00:53:48 |
| Jan Tojnar | In reply to @sebtm:lodere.es
So I can just merge it on my own (without review) because it only can get better? 😄
I mean, I don't really care (about the merge), I can just keep my nixpkgs-fork up2date but then I might just stop upstreaming it if there is no chance to get a review/merged. yeah, if there is no-one else interested in the code, self-merge should be fine | 10:48:29 |
