| 6 Apr 2023 |
 Jan Tojnar | if it is problematic for aarch64, we can disable the tests there, from the patch, it looks like it should not affect runtime | 02:22:15 |
| Jan Tojnar | I pushed a workaround for the test failure (verified pre-rebase), I want to merge this ASAP so that we can get as much people testing the GLib slice allocator fallout before branch-off as possible | 02:24:18 |
 bobby285271 | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
bobby285271: I would not block on the tracker issue, I do not think we support 32-bit platforms Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), but I built nothing yet. 🤔 | 08:06:37 |
| bobby285271 | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
bobby285271: I would not block on the tracker issue, I do not think we support 32-bit platforms * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), but I built nothing yet. 🤔 | 08:07:39 |
| bobby285271 | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
if it is problematic for aarch64, we can disable the tests there, from the patch, it looks like it should not affect runtime Yeah sounds good, I think aarch64 will be a channel blocker. 🤔 Do we have plans to expand the hydra jobset before merging? | 08:15:15 |
| bobby285271 | In reply to @jtojnar:matrix.org
if it is problematic for aarch64, we can disable the tests there, from the patch, it looks like it should not affect runtime * Yeah sounds good, I think aarch64 will be a channel blocker. 🤔 Do we have plans to expand the hydra jobset before merging? (I think it is x86_64-linux only right now?) | 08:18:11 |
| bobby285271 | * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), ~~but I built nothing yet~~ still did not build something, but nix why-depends .#steam-run .#pkgsi686Linux.tracker --impure says it is pulled in and steam-run builds for me on unstable. 🤔 | 08:30:00 |
| bobby285271 | * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), ~~but I built nothing yet~~ still did not build something, but nix why-depends .#steam-run .#pkgsi686Linux.tracker --impure says it is pulled in and steam-run builds for me on unstable. 🤔 | 08:30:07 |
| bobby285271 | * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), but I built nothing yet still did not build something, but nix why-depends .#steam-run .#pkgsi686Linux.tracker --impure says it is pulled in and steam-run builds for me on unstable. 🤔 | 08:30:18 |
| bobby285271 | * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), but I built nothing yet still did not build something, but nix why-depends .#steam-run .#pkgsi686Linux.tracker --impure on nixos-unstable says it is pulled in and steam-run builds for me on nixos-unstable. 🤔 | 09:00:48 |
| bobby285271 | * Hmmm, I am actually thinking of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/220688 since it sounds like a new regression (it mentioned Checkout #218143 in steps to reproduce and I originally thought 32-bit is involved), but I built nothing yet still did not build something, but nix why-depends .#steam-run .#pkgsi686Linux.tracker --impure on nixos-unstable says it is pulled in. 🤔 | 09:05:33 |
|  vcunat joined the room. | 09:58:48 |
|  @kiber_ogur4ik:national.catposting.agency joined the room. | 13:49:06 |
|  arcz joined the room. | 13:54:15 |
|  Lyndeno joined the room. | 17:31:31 |
| Jan Tojnar | It is probably fine to finish aarch64 builds in staging-next | 21:42:15 |
| 7 Apr 2023 |
| Jan Tojnar changed the room topic to "A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-adjacent desktop environments (Xfce, Cinnamon, Pantheon...)" from "A room for maintainers of GNOME & GNOME-adjacent desktop environments (Xfce, Cinnamon, Pantheon...)
Help testing GNOME 44 update https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/218143". | 20:05:17 |
| 8 Apr 2023 |
|  Radocruz joined the room. | 03:15:27 |
|  @maralorn:maralorn.de joined the room. | 19:32:48 |
