| 12 May 2026 |
 emily | I mean to ensure userdbd doesn't seem them as normal users | 14:24:53 |
| emily | just silencing the warning doesn't sound like a good idea | 14:25:02 |
 winston | gotcha | 14:26:22 |
| winston | too bad auto-allocate-uids is experimental | 14:26:40 |
| emily | eg user records have a disposition field we can probably use. but will need some investigation | 14:28:52 |
| emily | it may be lower risk to do the quick fix for now and userdbd after branch off. but will try to take a look | 14:29:22 |
| winston | looks like the relevant code is https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/219d894db92759854cdf4c92a61b5f36442338db/src/shared/user-record.c#L2059-L2074 and https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/219d894db92759854cdf4c92a61b5f36442338db/src/basic/uid-classification.c#L121-L126
I can't find anything about being able to set your own value for the field | 14:50:51 |
 @mcnesium:matrix.org | so, should I file an issue about this? | 20:24:18 |
| winston | I just manually skipped it for now and opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/519427, should have all the updates as of a couple of hours ago | 21:25:42 |
| 14 May 2026 |
|  tuhana joined the room. | 15:14:21 |
